US labor law currently permits a wide range of employer conduct that interferes with worker organizing. Enforcement delays are endemic, regularly denying aggrieved workers their right to an “effective remedy.” Sanctions for illegal conduct are too feeble to adequately discourage employer law breaking, breaching the international law requirement that penalties be “sufficiently dissuasive” to deter violations. Unfair union election rules allow employers to engage in one-sided, aggressive anti-union campaigning while denying union advocates a similar chance to respond and banning union organizers from the workplace or even from distributing information on company property. If confronted with clear evidence of employee support for a union, employers can force a formal election and manipulate the often lengthy pre-election period to pound their anti-union...
-
Search
-

Get my book at Southern Illinois University Press, The NCTE, Barnes and Noble, Amazon, Powell's Books, Politics and Prose, or Square Books.
Reading
- Top 25 Online Schools in 2010
- Virtual High School Opens 'Doors' to Learning
- First Report From Research Center Created by U. of Phoenix Attacks Critics of For-Profit Education
- Exclusive: Manufacturing Dissent at the Education Management Corporation
- “Program for Change: 2010-2030″ (A Proposal for Discussion)
- OK Go on net neutrality: A lesson from the music industry
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
-
Links

Beruit: La Llorona