writinginthewild.com

"nothing natural about it!"

  • Home
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Teaching Materials
    • How to Succeed in an Online Writing Class: Plan, Revise, Discuss
    • Open Source and Free Software for Students
    • Policies for Advanced Composition
    • Bibliography Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Syllabus for Professional Writing
    • Local Information for Coles County, Illinios
    • Oral Report Assignment for Professional Writing
    • Peer Critique Assignment for Professional Writing
    • Reading Charts
    • Resume/Cover Letter for Introduction to Professional Writing
    • Self-Commentaries
  • Sitemap
  • About
RSS
Monthly Archives: March 2009

Ignore That White Elephant, It’s Just the Textbook Industry

Posted on March 20, 2009 by Ray Watkins
Comments off

Technology is changing the way students learn. Is it changing the way colleges teach?

Not enough, says George Siemens, associate director of research and development at the University of Manitoba’s Learning Technologies Centre.

While colleges and universities have been “fairly aggressive” in adapting their curricula to the changing world, Mr. Siemens told The Chronicle, “What we haven’t done very well in the last few decades is altering our pedagogy.”

To help get colleges thinking about how they might adapt their teaching styles to the new ways students absorb and process information, Mr. Siemens and Peter Tittenberger, director of the center, have created a Web-based guide, called the Handbook of Emerging Technologies for Learning.

The Wired Campus, March 19, 2009

I don’t want to imply in any way that I think this is a bad idea. On the contrary, I think that this kind of this project and others, such as the Writing Spaces composition textbook initiative, are fundamental to the future of education in a democratic culture. They represent yet another moment in the ongoing triumph of the collective, open knowledge process.

What fascinates me about these sorts of projects is the timidity of their rhetoric. Perhaps this is simply the natural humility of some parts of academic culture, or perhaps it’s a hesitancy born out of a kind of Utopian burn out. After all, about every six months something or other– some technology, I should say– comes along claiming to be revolutionary.

Alongside this timidity seems to be an unwillingness to directly challenge the powers-that-really-be in academia, such as the textbook publishers. Of course, these sorts of project are pretty obviously ringing the death-knell for those $300 chemistry textbooks now haunting our campuses. But these projects don’t try to justify themselves in that fashion.

I guess we shouldn’t complain too much if this anti-corporate push never quite takes on an anti-corporate rhetoric; it may well be the best way to fly under the radar, as it were. One day the textbook publishers will wake up to find that collaboratively authored, profession-wide textbooks have completely taken their place. Another major loss for the old property regime.

Amplify

Categories: Professional, Writing

The Bird and the Bee “Polite Dance Song”

Posted on March 18, 2009 by Ray Watkins
Comments off

Amplify

Categories: Writing

The Long Daily Show Now

Posted on March 16, 2009 by Ray Watkins
Comments off

I am not very interested in topicality in the narrow sense; I’m more interested in the long now, the big picture, slow technology. That’s why I don’t try to write straight out of the news, and I never try to keep up. Those things are interesting in themselves, but they are also largely commercial processes that I think we should ignore whenever we can.

Still, over the last week or more I have been fascinated to watch the Daily Show take on CNBC’s financial and social recklessness, rightfully accusing them of abandoning the traditional journalistic role of watchdog. Stewart’s proximate target is the Jim Cramer, of the show “Mad Money,” but he also has bigger fish to fry.

The week before, of course, the topic of the moment was Rush Limbaugh’s role as de facto leader of the Republican party. On the one hand the media seems to be very defensive about Stewart, claiming that he can’t ‘have it both ways.’ He’s a comedian or he’s a lefty cultural critic; he can’t do that liminal dance that puts him somewhere neither here nor there.

On the other hand, Limbaugh, who’s much more of a demagogue than Stewart, and so by any measure has less credibility, if any at all, seems to be welcomed as a legitimate spokesperson. Limbaugh’s bombastic nonsense seems to go in one ear and out the other, to many media folk, but he’s still great news. Stewart, on the other hand, has to be brought down.

Stewart has a legitimate satirical and political problem. He built his empire by ruthlessly attacking the Neo-Conservatives. He’s credible because he’s funny and well informed. Now that Bush is history—until the trials—he has to figure out what to do next. Hypocrisy bashing has always been a strong suit; media hypocrisy bashing is proving to be both funny and insightful

Amplify

Categories: Language

Wikipedia Wins Again!

Posted on March 13, 2009 by Ray Watkins
Comments off

And what has been surprising in students’ attitudes toward Wikipedia? Though my evidence is anecdotal, in the years of teaching with Wikipedia I have found almost no difference in the range of opinions about Wikipedia held by student writers and those held by their – mostly – older teachers. I find that roughly the same proportion of people have concerns about reliability, open access, and information literacy among students and faculty, just as I find roughly the same number of enthusiastic adopters among teachers and students. But when I query reluctant students about how and where they formed their negative opinions about Wikipedia, they usually point to a classroom environment where they were penalized for using it as a source. They almost never have had an experience which encouraged them to move from simply using Wikipedia to writing for it. As we move from seeing Wikipedia as only a resource to an online intellectual community, students are more than ready to accompany us.

Are We Ready to Use Wikipedia to Teach Writing?, March 12, 2009, Robert E. Cummings

The case against Wikipedia, like too many things in academia, is more than a little specious, often dependent on a kind of willful ignorance. I knew a professor once who hated Wikipedia so much that he learned to post to it, just so that he could put in false information.

He’d then give his students a simple research task, knowing that most would go to Wikipedia and get the false information he had planted. When they told him what they had found, he’d go, “A HA! You went to Wikipedia didn’t you!” He had nothing to teach, just “don’t use Wikipedia.”

Cummings presents a clear outline of why this sort of thing– besides the ethical implications– represents a wasted opportunity in several directions. Most importantly, it misses a chance to teach students about writing, the production of knowledge, and audiences, among other things.

It also misses the opportunity to continue to develop Wikipedia as both an source of knowledge and a community of writers and knowledge builders. I think some students might find this process so compelling they would become committed Wikipedians. That’s a social good in itself.

I think, though, that Cummings (and the rest of us technology and writing lovers) have to go further than developing arguments in favor of new writing forms. We need an entire range of critical judgments that would allow us to separate the wheat from the chaff.

I think someone like Cummings should write a piece called, “Why I Don’t Have Students Compose Videos in First Year Writing,” or “Why I Don’t Think Twitter is Appropriate in Advanced Composition.” We don’t have to agree on every point, of course, but we need the debate if we are ever going to defeat the Luddites.

Amplify

Categories: Composition, Professional, Writing
Previous Entries
Next Entries
  • Share this Article

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1 other subscriber

  • View James Ray Watkins's profile on LinkedIn
  • Book Cover Image

    Get my book at Southern Illinois University Press, Amazon, or Powell's Books.

     

    The C.C.C.C webpage, A Taste for Language: Literacy, Class, and English Studies includes a short podcast interview with me along with links to these reviews:

    ... by Victor Villanueva in CCC 62.4 (June 2011)
    ... by Chanon Adsanatham in Teaching English in the Two-Year College 38.3 (March 2011)
    ... by Scott McLemee in Inside Higher Education (17 Feb 2010)

    Note: you need to be a member of NCTE, and a subscriber to the relevant journal, to read the reviews by Villanueva and Adsanatham; the review by McLemee is available to the general public.

  • Reading

    • 'Change.edu' and the Problem With For-Profits - Commentary - The Chronicle of Higher Education 2012/02/01
    • Jonathan Franzen: E-readers are 'damaging to society' - CSMonitor.com 2012/01/31
    • The Time is Now: Report from the New Faculty Majority Summit | Inside Higher Ed 2012/01/31
    • MIT Mints a Valuable New Form of Academic Currency - Commentary - The Chronicle of Higher Education 2012/01/26
  • Recent Comments

    • Irais on Corruption Studies, University Sports Division
    • Merle Carthens on Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Hellen Wright on Bibliography Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Queens Studio Cleaning Service on Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • email cover letter on Reading Charts
  • Links

  • Categories

  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
© writinginthewild.com. Proudly Powered by WordPress | Nest Theme by YChong