<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Scientific Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writinginthewild.com/2009/10/26/open-scientific-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writinginthewild.com/2009/10/26/open-scientific-writing/</link>
	<description>&#34;nothing natural about it!&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:25:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Claude Bradley</title>
		<link>http://writinginthewild.com/2009/10/26/open-scientific-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-5778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Claude Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writinginthewild.com/?p=1944#comment-5778</guid>
		<description>Different audiences require different types of writing and communication.  It can&#039;t be achieved with a single format.  In my work there are roughly 3 levels of discourse. The first is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://onschallenge.wikispaces.com/list+of+experiments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;laboratory notebook&lt;/a&gt; itself which can only be completely understood by chemists (this is by definition the necessary part of Open Notebook Science).  The second level is our &lt;a href=&quot;http://usefulchem.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;, which is written for communication with a broader scientifically literate community.  Most details of the research work are left out but points made link back to the laboratory notebook for inspection.  The third level consists of &lt;a href=&quot;http://drexel-coas-talks-mp3-podcast.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;talks&lt;/a&gt; that I give to audiences who often are not even scientists (often librarians and instructional technologists).  It does require a deliberate intent to reframe the work for different audiences but I think it is worth the effort for the discussions that it permits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different audiences require different types of writing and communication.  It can&#8217;t be achieved with a single format.  In my work there are roughly 3 levels of discourse. The first is the <a target="_blank" href="http://onschallenge.wikispaces.com/list+of+experiments"  rel="nofollow">laboratory notebook</a> itself which can only be completely understood by chemists (this is by definition the necessary part of Open Notebook Science).  The second level is our <a target="_blank" href="http://usefulchem.blogspot.com/"  rel="nofollow">blog</a>, which is written for communication with a broader scientifically literate community.  Most details of the research work are left out but points made link back to the laboratory notebook for inspection.  The third level consists of <a target="_blank" href="http://drexel-coas-talks-mp3-podcast.blogspot.com/"  rel="nofollow">talks</a> that I give to audiences who often are not even scientists (often librarians and instructional technologists).  It does require a deliberate intent to reframe the work for different audiences but I think it is worth the effort for the discussions that it permits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Scientific Writing Notebook/Netbook Fans</title>
		<link>http://writinginthewild.com/2009/10/26/open-scientific-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-5765</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Scientific Writing Notebook/Netbook Fans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writinginthewild.com/?p=1944#comment-5765</guid>
		<description>[...] here to see the original: Open Scientific Writing          By admin &#124; category: Notebook???????? &#124; tags: called-the-open, description, ideal, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to see the original: Open Scientific Writing          By admin | category: Notebook???????? | tags: called-the-open, description, ideal, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
