Never Let a Crisis Pass Unused

Every time there’s a budget problem the weasels come out of the woodwork, each with a plan to gut a program they never thought should be funded in the first place. That’s how, step by step, we’ve gotten to the point where the arts in the public schools, not to mention physical education, has largely been eliminated.

You’ll never hear a top administrator say, “Wait. Drawing and music is too important to loose. All of us in the top 25% of the district salary range will take a pay cut for the next two years.” The current crisis is no exception. At least one Representative, though, David R. Obey, is going against the grain.

Obey wants to use almost a billion dollars to prevent what many feel might grow into massive teacher layoffs in the next fiscal year (Lawmaker wants to shift some ‘Race to the Top’ funds to prevent teacher layoffs). “When a ship is sinking,” Obey says with rare common sense, “you don’t worry about redesigning a room.”

Obey has yet to be successful; in part becuase his idea might delay the “Race to the Top” program designed to re-tool “No Child Left Behind.” Who wants large scale lay offs in the public schools? Perhaps a demoralized union would accept some of the uglier changes, like merit pay, proposed in the so-called reforms…

Show Me the Money

It’s fundraiser week on my local Public Radio Station (WILL) and so I am feeling characteristically crabby about public life and services. It might be worse this year, since I discovered the wonders of BBC 3 and 4, and Canadian Public Broadcasting, all available without begging or commercials or the passive aggressive guilt tripping attitude typical of National Public Radio.

I value NPR, of course (I’ve been listening to it daily for almost 30 years) but it galls me that a radio station in the wealthiest country in the world, affiliated with a rich university, needs to ask for money from its listeners. We seem to suffer from a permanent lack of imagination when it comes to public services. A simple 1% sales tax on MP3 players would probably fund NPR once and for all.

I just read a piece about so-called “idea incubators” that are becoming more and more common at some universities (“The Idea Incubator Goes to Campus”). It’s not uncommon, of course, for public money to be transformed via a university into private wealth. What’s crazy, though, especially given the ongoing collapse of government financing, is that the universities never seem to get a cut.

If an idea is commercialized, it’s certainly true that the local community can benefit from the new jobs as well as the investment of capital. But if the universities retained a small share of the ownership of the products developed then the investment could pay real dividends. If all of this money was put into a single national fund, we could use it to make education more affordable for everyone.

The Coming (Girl) Robot Apocalypse

The idea that all women hate technology is wrong-headed, of course. There are a lot of women in this big world and there isn’t much that you can say that applies to all of them. And the best computer person I ever met was a woman named Tanya, back in graduate school. But there’s is something going on having to do with gender and technology. We tend to assign entire areas of tools to one gender or the other and mixing that up can cause a lot of confusion.

My family used to have a lot of trouble buying me Christmas presents, not because I was picky, but because I tended to cross those gender lines. I love cooking, so you could buy me pots and pans and cookbooks. (Inside cooking, too, not just grilling!) I also like to build things– I am putting in a deck this week– so you could also buy me tools. Some technologies seem to lie in-between: I’d love to have a digital cooking thermometer so I can see exactly when my steak is medium rare.

Some are less feminine than just intellectual and so less than masculine: a red flashlight that helps me see when I am using my telescope. And some are just geeky technology loving fun: the super all in one programmable remote control that I got from my mom a few years ago. The latter might be the most relevant to the ongoing struggle to get young girls to love technology (Camp designed to win girls over to technology). I am not at all sure, though, why people feel so powerfully compelled to stick to one particular gender area.

I had doll when I was a kid– I still have him, his name is Boy Boy– so maybe I was accidentally corrupted, but I have a hard time understanding why so many women (at least my age, in the United States) dislike technology. I’ve had women friends of all sorts, but the rarest seems to be engineers and computer scientists. Pardon my Freud, or maybe Darwin, but I am begging to think that this must have something to do with mating rituals. Do men reject women who love technology? Maybe there should be camp to teach men that geeky women are sexy.