The Emperor Looks Increasingly Naked

Unfortunately, Mr. Vaidhyanathan says, the discussion of college reinvention represents a watering down of higher education’s social contract—a process that has been in the works for decades. “What it is going to take to reinvigorate higher education in this country,” he says, “is a strong political movement to champion research, to champion low tuition costs as a policy goal, to stand up against the banks that have made so much money lending for student loans, and to reconnect public institutions to their sense of public mission.”

“That is going to be a long process,” he says. “It has taken 20 years to press universities down into this cowering pose, and it is going to take 20 assertive years to get back to the point where Americans view American higher education the way the rest of the world does.”

For Whom Is College Being Reinvented?” Scott Carlson and Goldie Blumenstyk

When I lived in the Philippines as a Peace Corps Volunteer in the 1980’s, the first measure of wealth wasn’t what people owned, as it was in the U.S., it was the condition of the roads. I live in Conception, Tarlac, a few hours north of Manila, the hometown of President Aquino, and the roads were constantly under construction. Filipino’s used to joke that each region should get its own president, in turn, so that every region could be developed.

Roads are a part of the social wage, the often unspoken benefits we get simply because we are citizens. We have great roads in the U.S., at least in most places, but no national health care or pension system. It’s no coincidence that most of the stimulus money went to building roads. Other parts of the infrastructure– airports, fiber optics, sewage, garbage collection– are just as important, of course, but roads have a special place in the American heart.

In the 1950’s and 60’s the social wage grew to include a cheap college education. The Reagan Revolution changed all that; we had less and less money for roads and infrastructure and college grew increasingly expensive. The social wage stagnated, shrank; we can’t get national health care, our pension systems are in trouble. We tend to think of roads– and cheap education and good infrastructure– as our birthright but they are not.

The social wage existed and grew because we fought for it, through unions. A lot of people thought that technology was going to make this social process– grabbing our share of profits in the form of the social wage– obsolete. Let them raise tuition; we’d use the internet to make education so ubiquitous it would be nearly free. (“Virtually” free, I should say.) Perhaps 2012 is the year that we began to realize that there’s no detour around the class struggle.

Jeff Tweedy, Mavis Staples, Sean Lennon: “Happy Xmas (War Is Over)”

It’s a good weekend to be a seller at a gun show. Particularly for those hawking assault weapons. As the last child killed in the Dec. 14 school massacre in Newtown, Conn. was laid to rest Saturday, gun enthusiasts across the country waited in long lines and thronged gun show booths in what many openly described as a rush to buy assault weapons out of fear that they could soon be outlawed. Reuters reporters went to gun shows in Pennsylvania, Missouri, and Texas to confirm the trend that is also backed up by local news reports. There was such a rush to get inside a Texas gun show Saturday morning that the Fort Worth Star Telegram says it prompted “comparisons to eager ‘Black Friday shoppers.’”

Gun Shows Packed With Customers Eager To Buy Assault Weapons,” Daniel Politi

The Best for the Rest

Average folks and higher education researchers have conflicting views of academia. Average folks believe that most college teachers are tenured professors and that most students are residential students who play ultimate Frisbee on the quad. Higher education researchers have a different view. We know that most teachers are actually part time adjuncts and graduate students. Residential college is for the top of the pool. Most students are part time commuters or community college students. The mistake that people make is that the most visible forms of higher education (e.g., elite research universities and liberal arts schools) are the most common.

orgtheory by fabiorojas, as quoted by Vanessa Vaile

Here’s the thing. If you take unions, and to a lesser extent, faculty governance, completely out of the picture you end up with a version of higher education that fabiorojas, in this post, calls “the best and the rest.” In other words, you get a system which has fully abandoned the goal of an educated society, and that no longer believes that scientific literacy is crucial to the future of human society. It’s a vision of utter powerlessness.

Instead, you get a system in which, as fabiorojas, says, a small minority of students “want genuine engagement and learning.” It’s expensive, though, and only available to the socioeconomic elite. That’s the best; taught by tenured faculty. The rest get “a credential and some basic vocational instruction.” That can be done on the internet, or at junior colleges, or community colleges, taught largely by adjuncts and graduate students.

I think fabiorojas is wrong on at least two counts. Humans, including teenagers, are seekers, programmed to be curious and interested in knowledge and understanding. If the system made some sort of sense, I think lots of people would choose, at various points in their lives, to immerse themselves in knowledge for a time. I also think the writer is wrong insofar as he or she implies that our current system is a tenable– or even stable– state of affairs.

Democratic culture won’t survive unless we continue to expand intellectual literacy. We can’t make good decisions otherwise; technological culture isn’t going away. In the U.S. fewer than 1/3 of us have undergraduate college degrees; that needs to double and then triple and it needs to happen sooner rather than later. It won’t happen, on or off-line, unless teachers put their own power back into the equations in the form of aggressive, unionized faculties.