Yearly Archives: 2008

McCain Hammers Away at ‘Spreading the Wealth’

Elizabeth Holmes reports from Manchester, N.H., on the presidential race.

John McCain continues to hint that Barack Obama’s economic policies teeter on socialism. He harped on the Democrat’s “spread the wealth” line at a New Hampshire rally Wednesday.

“Before government can redistribute wealth, it has to confiscate wealth from those who earned it,” McCain yelled to the crowd of about 2,000 at Saint Anselm’s college in Goffstown, N.H.

“Whatever the right word is for that way of thinking—” McCain then paused slightly, allowing someone in the crowd to fill in the blank. “Socialism!” a voice shouted.

McCain continued: “The redistribution of wealth is the last thing America needs right now. In these tough economic times, we don’t need government ‘spreading the wealth,’ we need policies that create wealth and spread opportunity.”

Washington Wire – WSJ.com : McCain Hammers Away at ‘Spreading the Wealth’.

When I got my first computer– an Apple IIe, bought with the money left me by my Uncle Benson– it was both a novelty and a very useful tool. If someone wanted to come over to my house and use it to write a resume (a nightmare on a typewriter) that was fine. More than a few of my friends took me up on the offer.

That seemed more like common sense than generosity. Why should the computer sit there unused when it could be used to take a tiny little bit of headache out of the world. I was reminded of that computer several times over the last several weeks, beginning with Governor Palin’s mocking, even angry sarcasm about community service.

The rhetoric of selfishness, always a staple of Republican economics, has reached a kind of crescendo recently; McCain is now mocking Obama’s reasonable idea that in hard times we need to be willing to “share the wealth.” They’ve even brought back some good old cold war sniping, calling him a near-socialist (what we once jokingly called a “pinko”).

This argument against generosity goes back to Nixon, at least, but flowered during the “greed is good” Reagan administration, around the same time I bought that first computer. It’s a kind of radical market libertarianism that has brought us most of our current economic problems, as even Alan Greenspan now admits. It can’t be allowed to win again.

John McCain has made Barack Obama’s distant connections years ago with “unrepentant terrorist” Bill Ayers a centerpiece of his campaign.

But McCain has much closer, more direct, and more recent connections to terrorists who committed acts far worse than Ayers, yet McCain’s links to “unrepentant terrorists” are completely ignored by the media. While Obama has forcefully condemned the past actions of Ayers, John McCain has never denounced his terrorist friends.

McCain’s “terrorist” connections are far worse than Obama’s links to Ayers. In the 1980s, McCain personally funded a guerrilla group (the Contras) that engaged in terrorist acts. Just last year, McCain expressed how “proud” he was of an ex-felon who urged shooting law enforcement agents in the head (G. Gordon Liddy). And earlier this year, the McCain campaign trumpeted the endorsement of a man who illegally provided weapons and money to terrorists; when a reporter questioned this, the McCain campaign refused to even criticize this criminal (Oliver North).

John K, Wilson on Tue, 10/07/2008

I’m not sure that a tit for tat strategy is a good idea in this case, but David Letterman’ quip about G. Gordon Liddy, got me thinking… I wasn’t the only one, either. (The quote is from a book promotion site but it still makes the point well enough.) Which candidate has most often embraced violent means of political change? Even setting aside the war, McCain wins.