Reading Over Writing

Sometimes when I listen to NPR’s Morning Edition in the mornings I get very frustrated. It’s a neo-commercial format, for one thing, rather than a true public service. (Another gift of Reaganomics.) The “sponsorships” (aka commercials) bug me most days; other days, its the weirdly self-congratulatory begging called “fund raising.” We are great! We are running out of money! You have to help!

In my case, it’s particularly galling that the University of Illinois, an organization with a budget in the hundreds of millions, has historically refused to fund its own public radio station. I find it galling when such an organization asks me, as a “member of the community” to give them money. This too is part of the routine irritations and ironies of our conservative age. Failure is success.

The real problem, though, is that they are a Jack of all Trades, Master of None sort of show. That means that when you hear a story about something you know about you often feel they missed the point entirely. This morning’s piece on recent research into college education, “A Lack Of Rigor Leaves Students ‘Adrift’ In College,” was a very welcome exception.

It’s an exception becuase it emphasized two of the dirty little secrets of college: students are not being challenged to learn to think critically, mostly becuase they are not asked to write much, and their educations are undermined by the use of consumer surveys (usually called student evaluations) in teacher assessment. Students do not have to do much work because you can’t upset your customers.

A more informed reporter would have also asked about the exploitation of teachers, which has done profound damage. I also think that these problems are rooted in the perennial focus on ‘the basics’ which is inevitably framed in terms of reading rather than writing. That’s easy to explain: writing and critical thinking can’t be taught on the cheap or graded with multiple choice tests.

Education in a Conservative Age

It’s an open debate about the relatively liberality of the U.S. citizenry, although it’s become almost a cliche that the media sees us as a center-right culture when most surveys would probably define us as center-left. We’ve always has a very dramatic conservative cadre, and the progressives are probably a little too Gandhian and bookish to sell much soap.

Especially in recent years, then, with all of their talk of guns and violence and the caliphate— backed by policies that encourage and spread gun ownership if not violence– the right has had a high profile. It can be difficult to recall, amidst all of this sturm ang drang, just how much damage the conservative movement has really done, especially since Reagan. We’ve not reached the end of it, either.

Among all the talk of Reagan’s 100th birthday, I was surprised to see so little written about the legacy of his corrosive impact on education: the attack on organized labor; the attack on public funding; the shifting of costs from the collective to the individual. We get paid less than we should; our schools are broke; when we finish college we are more in debt than ever before.

It seems to harder and harder to even imagine something different. All of these things existed before Reagan and the modern conservative movement, of course, but his great legacy is that he made anti-democratic, small-minded ideas about education seem necessary if not heroic. This transmogrification has reached full fruition in the so-called Tea party’s call for “smaller government.”

The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted

Academics– and perhaps writers in general– tend to take the old bromide of the pen being mightier than the sword a little too literally. It’s as much of an aspiration as a truism, especially in the short term. Academics interested in writing and new communication technologies tend to overstated the already overstated. The revolution won’t happen online.

Texts are just not that powerful; at least, not yet. And the most communication technologies can do is facilitate communication. It’s a kind of power, but it’s also a very limited kind of power. As events in Egypt have shown, if the need is great, and enough people willing, there will be a revolution, however messy and complicated the results. Il ya un extérieur du texte.

I wish people in my field would take this lesson more to heart. Too often, I think, academics in general believe that the most important way they can exert the power that comes from their privileged status is to write books and teach. This belief is only reinforced by the new communications folks’ routine hyperbole. Academia won’t be fixed by Facebook, either. It takes organizing.