Standardized Corruption

Here’s the right-wing plan for our schools: First,  cut off as much money as possible so that schools have to fight for every penny of funding. Second, destroy the teachers unions to destroy tenure and seniority.  Teachers will then have to fight to keep their jobs from the first day they are hired until their last day of work. Third, judge the resulting competition almost solely on a single measure: the standardized test.  Fourth,  wherever possible, dismantle public schools when you can and sell them off to private interests.

Last, exaggerate  and publicize the failures of the public schools while obscuring the failures and exaggerating the successes of the charter schools. This is not a conspiracy. This is simply the practical results of a “market-based” approach to public education rooted in a system of so-called “accountability.”  It’s hyper-competition. Markets are a-moral; ethics matter only if ethics can be used to increase profits. Markets are also never free; they are shaped by the participants in that market to maximize profitability. Right and wrong is secondary.

If the participants in a market are allowed to fully maximize their potentials for profit, that is, to fully deregulate the market, corruption is inevitable. The financial markets were radically deregulated– on the behest of Wall Street– and it led to the rescission and to ongoing fiscal crises all over the world. That’s what is happening more and more in the increasingly “market driven” public education system (see here and here).  If the corruption of financial capital caused catastrophic problems, imagine the results of this corruption of human capital.

The Competition is Coming

Those of us in proprietary online education have lived a charmed life, I think. The first wave of public online programs, which began nearly a decade ago, more or less failed. The public schools, too, seem to have dropped their historical role of making a low-cost, or at least a reasonably priced, education widely available to almost everyone. Thanks to the Republican far right’s success at choking off federal funds, costs continue to be shifted to individuals through tuition hikes.

That political process created a huge demographic gap which the for-profits (admittedly, also thanks to a great degree to regulators sleeping on the job) successfully rushed to fill. There’s no real low-cost alliterative at this point. Eventually, I think, the public sector is going to fill their historic role again, although it may be the community colleges, rather than the universities, that will eventually offer the low-cost online education necessary to any democracy.

I’ve described this before as a tortoise and hare race. The proprietary schools are fast but in the long run they can’t beat public education. Once this first, “it’s new so it must be better” phase has passed, proprietary education, like the charter schools, will find a niche, but won’t take over the system. The recent decision of several business schools to create online MBA programs isn’t quite the low-cost alternative, but it’s a sign that the tortoise is out there, slow but sure.

An Aging Luddite

I work online, and I think online writing classes work at least as well as face to face teaching. I love technology and gadgets too, even though they are too often tainted by consumerism. I am not certain of the source, but someone left this Douglas Adams quote as a comment on my site recently:

First we thought the PC was a calculator.  Then we found out how to turn numbers into letters with ASCII — and we thought it was a typewriter.  Then we discovered graphics, and we thought it was a television.  With the World Wide Web, we’ve realized it’s a brochure.

I went on short trip last weekend to Meramec Caverns— my GPS is the greatest thing since sliced bread on these trips–and I was struck, once again, by the image of people waving their cell phones around in the air, trying to get what we euphemistically call “service.”

I understand the impulse. The motel and the campground that surrounds the caverns is old-fashioned and doesn’t have internet connection. (Many modern campsites do.)  I don’t use my cellphone much, and as long as there’s television of some sort, I’m fine. I felt that little twinge of anxiety, though, knowing that I couldn’t call anyone if I got lonely.

What’s making me feel more and more like a Luddite, though, is the sheer ubiquity of people– almost all of them under 40, and most under 30, who seem so helpless addicted to nothing. I enjoy Facebook, to cite this year’s model as an example, but there’s no there there;  you look at a picture or two,  or maybe follow a link someone shared, laugh at a video, and then you are done.

Why is the brochure is so compelling that it requires almost constant attention, almost as if it were a pet or a child? I don’t believe that this is generational. When I was young, say, a teenager, I loved rock and roll music, but I was also aware that some people went too far with it and became fanatics. It was embarrassing at best, at worst dysfunctional. This fanaticism about the latest trend has become the norm.