Take Back Your Time

Never has our message been so close to winning broad acceptance. From many quarters, the message that our workaholic, time-rushed culture is harmful to health, families, communities and the environment, is beginning to ring out more clearly.

A recently-released study compared health in the United States and in the United Kingdom, finding stark evidence that Americans are far sicker than the British, despite spending more than twice as much on health care each year. Even poor Brits were as healthy as the richest Americans.

In a New York Times op-ed (“Our Sick Society,” 5/5/06) about the study, economist Paul Krugman asks what it is “about American society that makes us sicker than we should be?” Overwork, he suggests, is a leading culprit. Stress is another.

The study only compares the US with the UK, where working hours — though far shorter than in the US — are among the longest in Europe and health outcomes among the worst. A study comparing the US with the Scandinavian countries or many continental European countries would show an even wider gap between American health and theirs.

from Take Back Your Time

It all seems very long ago, but my ‘minor’ as an M.A.-level graduate student in the mid 1980s was economics. Actaully, though, it was just a chance to read Marx— Capital Volumes I, II, and III– and study with my hero, a professor named Harry Cleaver.

Harry had a seemingly simple reading of capitalism that still makes sense to me today: the main way we loose power over our lives is through work, and the best way to regain control is to reduce the work week. As Harry has written, “Work is Still the Central Issue.

With all that in mind, I was happy to hear on Rick Steves— yes, the travel show– about a group that is fighting to reduce the work week by, among other things, lobbying for increased vacation time, part-time work parity, health care, and a living wage.

Bubble Wrap

For new college graduates and people out of school for only a few years, financial worries are enormous. Home prices, even if they are starting to fall, remain very high relative to ordinary incomes, and higher mortgage rates are no balm to money worries either. All Americans carry more debt on average than in the past but the increase for young people is most striking since young workers generally earn the least. Between college loans and car loans, people in their 20s are amazingly burdened financially compared to earlier generations, especially compared to my own generation of late-stage baby-boomer.

G. Pascal Zachary, AlterNet. Posted November 18, 2006.

I went to college in two distinct periods of my life, first in the late 70s and early 80 when I got my B.A. and M.A. Then I went back to school in the 90s to get my Ph.D. In between I was a Peace Corps Volunteer and then a teacher in France. I still have loans from both periods of my life.

Even though I have never missed a payment, I still have a dozen or more years left before I will pay off my education. One source of my debt, for example, is that until recently the University of Texas did not have a tuition waiver program for graduate students. Texas, unfortunately, had no loan forgiveness program for Peace Corps service either.

I have not exactly led a traditional life, so maybe I am not a good example of the issues discussed by Zachary. I did not even consider buying a house, for example, until I was well into my mid-40s. I am, as he puts it, a late-stage baby boomer. Still, debt relief for student loans, excessive credit card interest, and predatory/sub-prime mortgages, seems only just, especially for those of us who went to school in the last twenty five years.

It seems shocking to me that this piling on of debt– a process, like many other bad things first begun in the Reagan administration– is only now beginning to get any attention. Much of this attention, of course, is due to recent kick-back scandals that may yet touch my alma mater. It may, in fact, come up in the next election if trends continue.

It’s a classic case of shifting the costs of credit, education, and home ownership, all of which have real social benefits, onto the backs of the individuals who can least afford it. I have already posted (April 11) the clip from the the In Debt We Trust documentary trailer. Danny Schechter, the journalist behind the documentary, has also set up an associated resource page called Stop the Squeeze.org.

Safe2pee.org

Welcome to safe2pee.org. We’re taking web innovations and applying them to a very real problem facing many in our society — harassment, violence and discrimination in public restrooms.

The goal of the project is to create a resource where people who do not feel comfortable with traditional public restrooms can find safe alternatives, and to support advocacy and research to further the cause of gender free, inclusive bathrooms. The service aims to be accessible from a variety of mediums (computer, cell phone browser, maybe even a call-in number?).

Safe2.Pee.org

This probably will seem a stretch for Friday, when I usually post something having to do with writing or language, but I like this mash-up so much to make it a special exception. I not at all sure how to write about this, it’s both strange and wonderfully progressive simultaneously. It’s good writing, too; they get the tone just right, which is pretty rare in many leftist circles.

I guess it is only strange if you have never had this problem, or never thought of it. Come to think of it, I did have this problem back in the 70s and early 80s when I had long hair. “This project was put together by and is often maintained by a genderqueer hackers collective,” the website says, “with a sense of humor and some anarchist tendencies.” Exactly.

I found the site by reading Annalee Newitz’s article, “Peeing By Design,” on AlterNet. Her blog is Techsploitation. Lots of good writing over there too.