Strange Fruit

I would prefer that Obama win the election—not so much because he’d be so much better than Romney on policy but because he will disappoint so many of his loyalists that it would be good for radical politics. Instead of people bellyaching about McCain’s awfulness, as they would have had he won in 2008, we got Occupy. Occupy faded, in part because attention was turned to the presidential campaign… Presidential politics, given the power of money and all our constitutional structures that nurture orthodoxy, is the natural terrain of the big boys. It would be much more fruitful to organize around specific issues, like single-payer health insurance and living-wage bills; to develop better institutions, like livelier unions and third and fourth parties; and if one must work in the electoral realm, to build from the bottom up, where the likes of us could actually make a difference.

Why Should the Left Support Obama? Doug Henwood”

At some level, I agree with Mr. Henwood– I usually agree with him— but at the same time I have some real misgivings. It’s true that lots of us have been so worried about the far right that we are willing to be, in effect, leftist yellow dog Democrats, willing to vote for any Democrat, even if he’s a yellow dog, figuratively or literally. I’m not sure that this is more than anecdote, but Facebook has made this election seem terrifying.

We’re all busy with families and jobs and to one extent or the other we are all low-information voters. On Facebook, though, I’ve discovered how deeply the right-wing has penetrated my family and friends back in Louisiana and Texas. I know conservatism well; I was raised by a man who joined the Republican effort to elect Reagan in 1976. I suspect Dad was Republican because he thought the chaotic Democratic party couldn’t run the country.

He shot himself in the foot. A few years into the Reagan era, when Dad died, the Republican administration had already succeeded in its efforts to eliminate Social Security’s once generous survivor’s benefits program. That made it much more difficult (among other things) for my little sister to go to college. Dad mistakenly thought Reagan would help him and the middle class. I see my family members and childhood friends making the same mistake.

Reagan’s election in 1980 was a landmark event, signalling more than three decades of erosion of power and affluence for everyone but the very rich. Reagan seemed like a bozo at the time and maybe he did no more than articulate the program already well underway. Romney seems like a very similar sort of clown, and maybe he too is doing nothing more than articulating the plan, but his ideas are worse than Reagan’s. We all need Obama to win.

Modern Mysogony

I probably shouldn’t be surprised by the current crop of misogyny among the far right but I am. This isn’t simply a case of taking one step back for every three steps forward. These men are repeating ideas about woman which seem to date to the last century, before woman could vote, much less before abortion was legal and contraception widely available.

We’ve been talking about feminist backlash for nearly two decades now and it has reached a kind of off-hand casualness that is astonishing. I found a remarkable post that catalogs the wide variety of rapes so far identified by Republicans:

GIFT-FROM-GOD-RAPE: “When life begins with that horrible situation of rape, that is something that God intended to happen.” -Richard Mourdock (R), candidate for Senate in Indiana, on October 23, 2012

“The right approach is to accept this horribly created, in the sense of rape, but nevertheless…a gift of human life, and accept what God is giving to you.” -Rick Santorum (R), Senator and Presidential candidate, on January 20, 2012

“Richard and I, along with millions of Americans…believe that life is a gift from God.” -Republican Senator John Cornyn of Texas voicing his support of Richard Mourdock’s statement about rape-induced abortions, on October 24, 2012

LEGITIMATE RAPE

“If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.” -Republican Congressman & Senate candidate Todd Akin of Missouri on August 20, 2012

HONEST RAPE

“If it’s an honest rape, that individual should go immediately to the emergency room, I would give them a shot of estrogen.” -Republican Congressman & Presidential candidate Ron Paul of Texas on February 3, 2012

EMERGENCY RAPE

“It was an issue about a Catholic church being forced to offer those pills if the person came in in an emergency rape.” -Republican Senate candidate Linda McMahon of Connecticut (also confusing churches with hospitals) on October 15, 2012

EASY RAPE

“If you go down that road, some girls, they rape so easy.” -Republican State Representative Roger Rivard of Wisconsin, on December 21, 2011 and endorsed by VP Candidate Paul Ryan on August 9, 2012

FORCIBLE RAPE

Republican Vice-Presidential nominee Paul Ryan, Todd “legitimate rape” Akin and 214 other Republicans co-sponsored the “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act”, which would prohibit federal funding of abortions except in instances of “an act of forcible rape or, if a minor, an act of incest.” -H.R. 3, 112th Congress, January 20, 2011

GOP Misogyny: Republican Embrace of Rape Culture” Nancy a Heitzeg

It’s as if there were a secret linguistic underground out there that had long been discussing rape in this hateful fashion and, without anyone really noticing, developing an entire misogynistic lexicon.

Mansplaining

“In my second year on the tenure-track as an English professor at a state university in Texas, I was advised to think about my plans for university and community service to be ready for my tenure bid in four years. On my self-evaluation form that year, I stated that I planned to initiate a National Organization for Women student chapter the following year. A few days later, my department chair stopped by my office to scold me. He said, “About your plans for a NOW chapter … we don’t need any of that nonsense here in West Texas.” I was too stunned to say anything, and he left after giving me a stern look. A year later, his wife told me at a departmental party that his two daughters used to complain about his old-fashioned ideas about women’s equality, but she then said that, essentially, “you can’t teach an old dog new tricks.” I suppose she meant to express sympathy with me, but also meant to warn me not to cross him about the NOW issue.”

More here.

The Beginning of the Beginning of the End

Today, more than 70 percent of all faculty members responsible for instruction at not-for-profit institutions serve in non-tenure-track (NTT) positions. The numbers are startling, but numbers alone do not capture the essence of this problem. Many of our colleagues among this growing category of non-tenure-track faculty experience poor working conditions and a lack of support. Not only is it difficult for them to provide for themselves and their families, but their working conditions also interfere with their ability to offer the best educational experience for their students.

A New Faculty Path,” Adrianna Kezar, Susan Albertine and Dan Maxey

I’d like to say that this ongoing research project, housed at the University of Southern California’s Pullias Center for Higher Education, and dubbed, “The Changing Faculty and Student Success,” is very good news. After all, the project is founded on the recognition of the basic problem in higher education, which isn’t for-profits or new communication technologies, but the end of tenure and the loss of most full-time teaching positions.

It is good news insofar as it might signal at least the beginning of the beginning of the end. It also lays the groundwork for what might happen once the U.S. economy emerges out the recession. It could be a while before economic growth allows universities to have realistic budgets, bu there are some signs that full-time teachers could become a selling point in the emerging post for profits market. This might nudge that process in the right direction.

I hesitate only because the article, and the research project, is so chock-full of corporate speak or corporate-academic speak. I’ve gotten too many emails about my “customers” (my students) to be very comfortable with a rhetoric of “stakeholders” and “student success” and the like. The problem, of course, is that real change will involve as much conflict as consensus and a university should be about faculty and staff as much as students.