Fast Education, Part II

Parents and students “have no solid evidence, comparable across institutions, of how much students learn in colleges or whether they learn more at one college than another” (13). To address these problems, the Spellings commission urges a number of reforms. The most controversial is that, to improve accountability, “higher education institutions should measure student learning” (23) using “quality-assessment data” that would be made public. These “outcomes-focused” measurements of what students are learning at particular colleges would “be accessible and useful for students, policymakers, and the public,” as well as for academics themselves (23), and would enable parents and prospective students to compare the quality of education offered by different colleges and universities.

Comments on the Spellings Commission Report, from the Executive Council of the Modern Language Association of America, March 2007

First there was the fiasco of No Child Left Behind, which Brian Stecher has called “a failure of imagination,” that “focuses on a very narrow set of outcomes, and ignores many elements that students and their families find satisfying, challenging and motivating about their schools.” It’s also a boon for the standardized testing industry and contributes to shrinking budgets for everything from physical fitness to music education.

In classic Bush fashion, since it did not work, it’s time to bring the same programs to colleges and universities. This time, though, things are different. The Bush administration does not quite have the sexy cache it once had, to say the least, and the parties involved are much more powerful than teacher’s unions and parents groups. So the creation of a denatured, narrow curriculum, seem to have hit a snag. Here’s the MLA’s timid but nonetheless strikingly critical response.

What’s interesting about the Spelling Commission’s report is its utter irrelevance. It says nothing about the rise in the use of part-time labor, inflated tuition and fees, the destruction of academic freedom of speech, the rise of proprietary education. or the general dying up of funding for higher educatoin. It looked at an entire system in crisis and it decided that the best solution was standardized testing.

Fast-Education

A major factor for e-learning’s growth potential is the part-time or adjunct instructor. Each adjunct costs about 20 percent (or less) of a full-time counterpart on a per-class basis.6 An adjunct professor often receives no office, phone, mailbox, computer, health benefits, and so forth, and needs another full-time job to survive… The growth of part-time faculty has been significant: according to the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), during the period 1975 to 2003, full-time tenure-track positions increased by 18 percent while full-time non-tenure-track and part-time positions grew at 10 times that rate.

from E-Learning at a Crossroads—What Price Quality?
By Stephen R. Ruth, Martha Sammons, and Lindsey Poulin

I wrote about this subject at a recent Computers and Writing presentation I gave and while it was well received I could also tell that I had not persuaded my audience of the scale and scope of the problem. I think this is because they were mostly traditional academics immersed in the trials and tribulations of attempting to integrate technology into education.

They have a particular agenda, and a specific set of associated problems, and it is hard for them to commit their limited energies elsewhere. I understand that completely, because I was in that situation for a long time. This problem cannot be ignored for long. As I argued in my talk, I believe that the proprietary institutions are creating a second tier of education focused on the bottom of the class hierarchy.

On the one hand, this could be making education available to those that would not otherwise have access. On the other, this could be the birth of the fast-education market, analogous to the birth of fast food in the 1950s. Ruth, Summons, and Poulin, somewhat optimistically argue that “the biggest problem could be finding and integrating tens of thousands of new adjunct professors as partners in the academy.”

I am a little less optimistic, simply because the U.S. academic system is so profoundly rooted in class privilege and material entitlement. It might be possible, for example, to isolate and shrink proprietary education by offering a cheaper alternative taught by well-paid (and medically insured) full-time professors. That might even be the ethical thing to do. It’s as difficult, though, as asking the insurance industry to accept national health care.

Not Yet Gen Net

One implication of our results is that these students’ attitudes and beliefs toward technology are integrated with their experiences as (specifically) liberal arts college students. Undergraduate students at highly technical institutions may (and likely do) hold different beliefs about teaching and learning, as well as the role of technology in that experience, which may in turn shape what they consider to be a good student in their institutional context. This underscores the point that, given the multiple ways that technology is culturally embedded in Net Gen students’ lives, we should not make blanket assumptions about its use.

Questioning Assumptions About Students’ Expectations for Technology in College Classrooms,” in Innovate, June/July 2007
Volume 3, Issue 5
by Sarah Lohnes and Charles Kinzer

This is a small scale but persuasive research article that makes a point that ought to be more obvious than it is. Despite the hype about the “net-generation” of technologically savvy kids, not all students have chosen to integrate new communications technologies into every nook and cranny of their lives.

The authors suggest an explanation rooted in institutional culture, which makes sense, and call for a more nuanced view of how technology is used in and out of the classroom. I would also suggest that this study hints at some interesting class dynamics. Perhaps old-fashioned face to face education is becoming an entitlement of the well-off, like valet parking or health care.

Librarian Chick!

Hello, and welcome to Librarian Chick!

This a list of free resources for students and educators… and anyone else who’s hip to learning. Feel free to click away! Though many of these resources could be listed under multiple categories, I’ve only added them once so you can CTRL+Click all links to open in tabs and never open the same page twice.

Librarian Chick

This is one of those self-evidently useful sites, full of information gathered from 6 years of software reviewing at TuCows huge shareware website. The Library Chick herself says it’s “a list of free resources for students and educators… and anyone else who’s hip to learning.”

She also points to FOSSwiki (a site for Freeware and Open Source Software) and her blog, “She Dreams in Digital.” As if that were not enough, she includes Librarian Chick Learning Center’(“search for free educational information, sites, games and software online!”), and Librarian Chick | Book Search (a tool to search for free ebooks).