Got Talent?

For decades, the United States has stayed ahead of the talent curve because of the vast number—and high educational levels—of the baby boomers. Since the 1960s, the number of American adults with college degrees has quintupled, and with each retirement wave, older workers have been replaced by younger workers who are better educated.

But who will replace the baby boomers? The replacement pool, Generation X, born between 1965 and 1977, and Generation Y, born between 1978 and 1990, isn’t big enough to replace every retiree. The growth in the American labor force is likely to come from immigrants, not from home-grown workers.

Educational gains are slowing down as well. Between 1980 and 2000, the percentage of workers with a college degree grew from 21 percent to 30 percent. But recent estimates say it is likely to rise to only 33 percent by 2020.

from the Pew Center on the States

I’m not certain that I completely agree with some of the conclusions suggested by this introduction to the Pew Center’s fantastic new site for educational statistics. We may be, for example, on the verge of an huge increase in productivity, especially in the developing world, that will change everything about this notion of having enough children to replenish the current workforce.

I have a kind of Utopian wish/dream, too, that people in the first world will begin to resist many of the assumptions on which the current economic system rests. How much longer, for example, will people accept the 40 hour work week, now nearly a century old. All of these numbers change dramatically if the work week changes to, say, 30 hours.

What’s also amazing to remember is that more than 2/3’s of the people in the U.S. do not have a college degree. We’ve never quite been as affluent as we like to think. Obama’s new economic program relies heavily on educational spending, and, on trying to make a college degree more accessible. I think we might have a very different culture if we were to reach 50% or higher.

The Bush Whitewash

President Bush’s poll ratings were among the highest and lowest that modern presidents have ever received — but feelings about George W. Bush the person never fell as far as his job approval numbers.

Ask his staff or his friends to describe the president, and they’ll say “Normal, regular — if he moved in next door, you’d be friends.” The president made an effort to keep his life normal. He likes meetings to begin and end on time; he likes a schedule.

Weekend Edition Sunday, January 11, 2009

I’m increasingly irritated at National Public Radio’s coverage of current events. It’s always been, “Most Things Ignored,” of course, but the alternative media has grown so strong in recent years that it hardly matters. You can learn more from any given Fresh Air episode than you can from a week of “All Things Considered.” You can get a good outline of what’s going on from NPR but it’s no longer any more substantive than, say, the networks’ nightly news programs.

Even worse than the lack of substance is the substitution of an angry, argumentative tone for real analysis and understanding. It’s been particularly obvious in the last few weeks as the Bush propaganda machine attempts to re-tool the brutality and sheer stupid incompetence of his administration. Bush and company began their long campaign by creating a ‘good-old-boy’ image that they felt would be easy to market to their core constituency. He seems to be bringing it back one last time.

What drives me crazy about NPR is that the reporters seem to buy into the public relations campaign almost whole-cloth. Instead of talking about why the Bush administration is peddling their oldest story again, reporters seem to be “analyzing” the question of whether or not Bush is or is not a really fun guy. Some of the reports even seem to feel sorry for him. Meanwhile, of course, the economy continues to collapse, the wars go on, the horrors of Gaza go on.

How Change Happens

Economic storms historically have prompted more adults to seek shelter in the classroom. But this time around, two-year colleges and private for-profit institutions are especially optimistic about attracting more students—and many of those older students will probably take courses online, according to one of the authors of a recent survey.

The 2008 Sloan Survey of Online Learning, released in November before the extent of the recession was clear, found that while all types of colleges anticipate enrollment bumps because of high unemployment, two-year and private for-profit institutions expect to increase their rolls more than others since they “tend to offer programs that have traditionally been tailored to serve working adults.

Recession May Drive More Adult Students to Take Online Courses, STEVE KOLOWICH, January 9, 2009

Step by step, we are creating a new education system without any sense of where we are going. The outlines of the new system have begun to become a little clearer, however. Much of this change is dependent on historical timing. There was the internet boom, which led to the dot-com crash, and then the housing boom. This created a new sort of infrastructure fed by an Utopian ideology that said these technologies ought to be in every home and classroom.

The internet boom jump-started the internet infrastructure, and the collapse of that bubble fed the housing boom, which bought everyone enough time to get these technologies to the point where their effects cannot be reversed. Utopia got us over the rough spots. Now that the housing bubble has burst, dragging the entire economy with it, more people will take advantage of the new infrastructure to use education to improve their chances on the job market, once the bust plays itself out.

All of this is just the public theater of change; behind the scenes, more profound transformations are taking place. As a profession and a public service, higher education has become lopsidedly bifurcated. An increasingly small minority have what was once a relatively secure position in full-time, tenure track positions. The majority do not. Similarly, the old liberal arts model of education threatens to become the privileged experience of a minority.

I understand the funding concerns but I don’t think this is a funding problem. if something is a priority– say, a bank or auto bail out– the money is available. The real questions have to do with the nature of jobs and job security and with the purposes of education. Conservative ideology has made the notion of job security seem antiquated. That magical force, “the market” has supposedly made such a thing impossible. Why should professors be any different?

And technology, rather than education in the old liberal arts mode, has the Utopian edge that pushes people into long term commitments and projects. Don’t get me wrong. I make my living teaching on the internet and I can see the reality of how these new infrastructure has made a certain kind of education more accessible. I worry, though, that as we are busily trying to get through this recession we are normalizing some deep cuts in our expectations.