Playing With Fire

Georgia congressman and Civil Rights leader John Lewis, reacting to the increasingly incendiary atmosphere at McCain-Palin campaign rallies, condemned the GOP for using tactics that are creating a mood not unlike the one created by George Wallace, the former segregationist governor and presidential candidate. Lewis accused the Republicans of “sowing the seeds of hatred and division,” and warned the McCain campaign that they are “playing with fire:”

Huffington Post | Nicholas Graham | October 11, 2008

He’s right. The Huffington Post has a great collection of stories and videos on the pattern of callousness and hints of violence. I think many of us have had this question in the back of our mind since Obama launched his campaign: when will the more overt racist attacks start, and what form will they take? Now we seem to have our answer. In an early stumble, Obama seemed to see this coming, of course.

In many ways the Midwest, where I live, is ideal; no long commutes or pollution, nice people. The Midwest is also a culture of white racial enclaves, small towns and regions that have maintained monoculturalism against all odds. It can be a very harsh environment for young working class families. Many small towns have long ago emptied out, ghost towns created by corporate, large scale farming and globalization; it’s not just apple pie and ice cream, it’s crank and militias.

This seems to be the natural environment for the anger and resentment that Palin taps into at her rallies, and it’s not surprising that it has taken on this flavor of a strange xenophobic racism. The foreigner, the Arab, and the urban, sophisticated black are all wrapped up into this neat, creepy fear-mongering package. The real American terrorists, of course, were the lynch mobs that Palin toys with so dangerously.

Sarah Palin’s (Empty) Rhetorical Style

The heart of Sarah Palin's appeal is —

Wait, did you see that? There! She did it again: wrinkled up her nose in a way that either looks like a sneer or is adorably reminiscent of Samantha from "Bewitched." Depending on whom you talk to.

Style: Examining Sarah Palin’s Rhetorical Style. Libby Copeland, Washington Post

Governor Palin reminds me of a boss I once had. He was good looking, always ready with a smile, and on the surface supportive and helpful. He seemed the ideal academic administrator. Over the course of several years, however, the bright surface seemed more and more like a flashing mirror distracting you from his real goals. He demanded total control over his little kingdom.

Eventually, I came to realize that he was a profoundly immoral human being; a particular type of tyrant that is all too common. I don’t think you can call him manipulative in any substantive sense, because the link between appearance, the public face, and the private power, the authoritarian control, is so close. It’s what success looked and felt like to him: to be powerful is to fool people.

He did some awful things, too, ruining lives in both petty and serious ways and undermining the ability of teachers to do their jobs. He could never be held responsible, though, because on the one hand he had that smiling face, and on the other hand he had a gun under his coat and he was not afraid to use it. We all thought he would certainly become a dean.

My partner is livid that Palin is the “type” that now represents successful women– successful politics– to so many. It particularly galls her that so few seem to even want to try to see behind the flashing mirrors; it’s as if the substance is irrelevant, and nothing matters but the performance. We point out the wink, but then, in effect, we wink in return: isn’t that adorable!

It’s exactly like my old boss. In fact, I think we in academia have had a hand in promoting a way of thinking, so well represented by the Washington Post article, that empties out the content of rhetorical analysis. Maybe it’s because it’s so important to a successful career in the American university. There’s ugliness behind that cute little nose wrinkle, though, and we ignore it at our peril.

Zotero: Property is Theft, But Don’t Quote Me On That

This just in, via beSpacific – Reuters is suing George Mason University for violating the Endnote TOS. Apparently (though I’m not sure I really understand the issue – this news story is very cryptic) Reuters claims the organization violated the terms of service when they analyzed ways to convert style files from Endnote to Zotero. Reuters (parent company of ISI, parent company of Endnote) accuses Zotero’s programmers of reverse-engineering Endnote files to make the conversion possible and that this threatens to destroy their customer base.

The Mark of Zotero, ACR Log, Barbara Fister, September 28th, 2008.

Here’s a bit more on the new forms of property front– or, rather on the old forms of property will defend themselves even when threatened in the most trivial ways front. Endnote has it’s own, uh, footnote in history, since it marked an early watershed in the automation (sort of) of certain aspects of writing. I imagine it is still very popular in certain scientific fields.

Zotero is the open-source challenger, although I am not certain that it is quite as full featured as Endnote. I am certain that will change, slowly but surely. What’s always interesting is the way open source tends to strip away the liberal niceties, maybe especially in relation to education. The rhetoric is all about making it easy to use and share knowledge, until you threaten my cash cow.