Thread Heads

Here’s a great idea: fight consumerism by encouraging people to treat recycled clothing as raw materials. It has enviromental implications too. The shirt is ugly, but the dresses are cool. The coffee-stained blue jeans are really great.

It’s hard to figure out all of the players, but these folks turn out to be part of a network of like minded people. NikiShell seems to be at the heart of it, but there is also the Threadbanger site too. Witty and fun and naive and good-hearted in the way punk was funny and good-hearted and naive.

Not Yet Gen Net

One implication of our results is that these students’ attitudes and beliefs toward technology are integrated with their experiences as (specifically) liberal arts college students. Undergraduate students at highly technical institutions may (and likely do) hold different beliefs about teaching and learning, as well as the role of technology in that experience, which may in turn shape what they consider to be a good student in their institutional context. This underscores the point that, given the multiple ways that technology is culturally embedded in Net Gen students’ lives, we should not make blanket assumptions about its use.

Questioning Assumptions About Students’ Expectations for Technology in College Classrooms,” in Innovate, June/July 2007
Volume 3, Issue 5
by Sarah Lohnes and Charles Kinzer

This is a small scale but persuasive research article that makes a point that ought to be more obvious than it is. Despite the hype about the “net-generation” of technologically savvy kids, not all students have chosen to integrate new communications technologies into every nook and cranny of their lives.

The authors suggest an explanation rooted in institutional culture, which makes sense, and call for a more nuanced view of how technology is used in and out of the classroom. I would also suggest that this study hints at some interesting class dynamics. Perhaps old-fashioned face to face education is becoming an entitlement of the well-off, like valet parking or health care.

Wikipedia 2.0

This study examines the degree to which Wikipedia entries cite or reference research and scholarship, and whether that research and scholarship is generally available to readers. Working on the assumption that where Wikipedia provides links to research and scholarship that readers can readily consult, it increases the authority, reliability, and educational quality of this popular encyclopedia, this study examines Wikipedia’s use of open access research and scholarship, that is, peer-reviewed journal articles that have been made freely available online… The results suggest that much more can be done to enrich and enhance this encyclopedia’s representation of the current state of knowledge. To assist in this process, the study provides a guide to help Wikipedia contributors locate and utilize open access research and scholarship in creating and editing encyclopedia entries.

from What Open Access Research Can Do for Wikipedia, First Monday, volume 12, number 3 (March 2007)

It’s slow reading, I know, but this study illustrates what I think might be the next stage of Wikipedia’s evolution: scientific respectability. Willinsky calls Wikiepeidia, “literacy’s ultimate democracy,” and makes a compelling case for finding ways of integrating open access science into the online encyclopedia. It seems to me a marriage made, uh, here on Earth somewhere. Here’s an introduction to open access science, by Peter Stuber.