Catholic Workers

–In economics, private and state capitalism bring about an unjust distribution of wealth, for the profit motive guides decisions. Those in power live off the sweat of others’ brows, while those without power are robbed of a just return for their work. Usury (the charging of interest above administrative costs) is a major contributor to the wrongdoing intrinsic to this system. We note, especially, how the world debt crisis leads poor countries into greater deprivation and a dependency from which there is no foreseeable escape. Here at home, the number of hungry and homeless and unemployed people rises in the midst of increasing affluence.

–In labor, human need is no longer the reason for human work. Instead, the unbridled expansion of technology, necessary to capitalism and viewed as “progress,” holds sway. Jobs are concentrated in productivity and administration for a “high-tech,” war-related, consumer society of disposable goods, so that laborers are trapped in work that does not contribute to human welfare. Furthermore, as jobs become more specialized, many people are excluded from meaningful work or are alienated from the products of their labor. Even in farming, agribusiness has replaced agriculture, and, in all areas, moral restraints are run over roughshod, and a disregard for the laws of nature now threatens the very planet.

Reprinted from The Catholic Worker newspaper, May 2008

I am always arguing with my large Catholic extended family because they are so conservative, almost without exception. They have a particularly hard time, for some reason, accepting any program other than charity that might ameliorate poverty; labor unions are anathema; most are profoundly suspicious of government as such.

I have some sense of the social origins of these ideas. We are from the south, where there are few labor unions; without exception we are only a generation or two away from a profound poverty in Mississippi and Louisiana in the 1920s and 30s. My Dad, whose family was destroyed by diseases rooted in poverty, believed the poor could only help themselves.

All of these fears have been very purposefully manipulated by the U.S. right wing for more than forty years, particularly since the Reagan administration. What I find most amazing is that these ideas seem to be in direct contradiction to both the general message of the Christian New Testament, and to the Catholic church’s modern teachings on the dignity of labor.

I am not sure that many of them will be willing to read through encyclicals– who would?– but I think it’s still an important point to make as the Obama program begins to gain steam and the level of paranoia inevitably rises. I keep wondering, though, what will be more frightening, the right’s dystopian rants and visions or the real suffering of the next year or more.

Facts and Myths

Total by Sub-category

As to the economics, remember that when it comes to deficits and debt, the real issues over the long term are (1) the ratio of debt to GDP (we’re still under 50 percent, which ain’t bad, considering all the spending that’s been going on; at the end of World War II it was substantially above 120 percent). And (2) whether and when we’re back to growing the GDP, which is the most reliable way of improving the ratio.

Obama’s Goal: Halving the Budget Deficit by 2012. Really?” Monday, February 23, 2009, Robert Reich

If Obama is mostly successful, then the epistemological skepticism natural to conservatives will have been discredited. We will know that highly trained government experts are capable of quickly designing and executing top-down transformational change. If they mostly fail, then liberalism will suffer a grievous blow, and conservatives will be called upon to restore order and sanity.

The Big Test,” February 23, 2009, David Brooks

The next several months– much of the summer too, no doubt– is going to be party-time for the right wing, wacky to relatively reasonable, as the debate over the Obama changes begins to build up steam. I think some careful educational reading is in order.

I don’t think it’s quite true, as Brooks claims, that the Obama administration is inventing a plan whole-cloth alone in an office. I don’t know the history of each of these ideas, but certainly everything from deficit spending to green energy investing has a rich and varied history they can use.

Brooks’ fears about bureaucrats is a gentile version of the Reagan hypocrisy. The right’s myth says one thing– big government is bad, the market is good– and then does something else. Expand the government by expanding the defense budget; ignore the market when your pals want a no-bid process.

I think there is psychological truth to the paranoid sounding notion that the right would like to cripple government by bankrupting it both ideologically and financially. I can’t think of any other reason why they (in the guise of Bobby Jindal) would propose a simplistic repetition of bad policy.

I think Robert Reich is a good guide to the stimulus plans and budget, although I think his lack of confidence in the economic recovery might be overstated, perhaps purposefully. We also have a lot of data that will help flush out the myths; I like the Swivel Site for the visuals, which help me keep track of things.

The Work of the Future

In the late 18th century, the Industrial Revolution started the transition from a manual-labor based economy towards an economy based on using technologies, tools and machines to significantly improve the manufacturing of physical goods. Over the next two hundred years we have seen the industrial sector of the economy achieve major improvements in the productivity and quality of manufacturing, ranging from very simple to highly complex physical objects.

A major step in that remarkable story of innovation occurred around thirty years ago. Before that time, most manufacturing plants were fairly inefficient by almost any contemporary measure, and were turning out products of varying quality. Then, driven by the huge success of Toyota and other companies around the world, the industrial sector and academia discovered the merits of applying engineering discipline as well as a holistic, systems-wide approach to manufacturing processes. Company after company embraced the Toyota Way, Six Sigma, Lean Production and similar methods in their manufacturing and logistics operations, which have brought the industrial sector of the economy to a whole new level of productivity and quality.

The Industrialization of Services, Irving Wladawsky-Berger, February 23, 2009

I think Wladawsky-Berger is correct: the next wave of digital rationalization is going to be in services, and that explains the hype and or excitement around cloud-computing. I think he’s also right that a big part of this is going to be a massive reinvention of consumer appliances.

The genius behind the CD was that you had to re-buy all of your music; it was a boon to the music industry. The next wave will attempt to get us to re-buy all of our appliances. In part this is going to be a good thing– new appliances are more energy efficient, for example– but in part it’s going to be silly.

Do you need to be able to peek into your refrigerator at home while you are sitting at your desk at work? Someone will insist that your house’s Twitter account provides an essential service to yourself and your neighborhood. What is missing from the piece, though, is some sense of how these services will change work.

Efficiency and productivity push the unemployment numbers. Usually the larger economy compensates by creating jobs elsewhere. At least that’s how things have worked in recent decades. But at some point we will either have to invent faux industries to occupy our time or shorten the work week.