Vacation Like the French

The most astonishing revelations in Michael Moore’s Sicko have nothing to do with healthcare. They’re about vacation time. French vacation time, to be precise.

Sitting at a restaurant table with a bunch of American ex-pats in Paris, Moore is treated to a jaw-dropping recitation of the perks of social democracy: 30 days of vacation time, unlimited sick days, full child care, social workers who come to help new parents adjust to the strains and challenges of child-rearing. Walking out of the theater, I heard more envious mutterings about this scene than any other.

“Why can’t we have that?” my fellow moviegoers asked.

The first possibility is that we already do. Maybe that perfidious Michael Moore is just lying in service of his French paymasters. But sadly, no. A recent report by Rebecca Ray and John Schmitt of the Center for Economic and Policy Research suggests that Moore is, if anything, understating his case. “The United States,” they write, “is the only advanced economy in the world that does not guarantee its workers paid vacation.” Take notice of that word “only.” Every other advanced economy offers a government guarantee of paid vacation to its workforce. Britain assures its workforce of 20 days of guaranteed, compensated leave. Germany gives 24. And France gives, yes, 30.

Ezra Klein | July 19, 2007 | The American Prospect

I am not sure what I can add to this– the ongoing astonishment of Americans at just how much better things could be is, well, astonishing. The oddest thing about globalization is that Americans know so little about the globe.

Or, rather, our attention is rarely focused on the standards of the developed world, or how we might be measured against it’s standards. After two Bush presidencies how are we doing? We don’t get paid enough, we have no health insurance, and our vacations are too short. Mission accomplished.

H-Net Reviews

H-Net is an international interdisciplinary organization of scholars and teachers dedicated to developing the enormous educational potential of the Internet and the World Wide Web. Our edited lists and web sites publish peer reviewed essays, multimedia materials, and discussion for colleagues and the interested public. The computing heart of H-Net resides at MATRIX: The Center for Humane Arts, Letters, and Social Sciences Online, Michigan State University, but H-Net officers, editors and subscribers come from all over the globe.

Humanities and Social Sciences Online Net

H-Net is a kind of ‘web 1.5’ resource– halfway between the old static content of the 1990s and the social networking and participation sites common today. It’s has a very old school look and feel, but it is still a great place to do some reading to see what academia is up to in the humanities and social sciences.

“Among H-Net’s most important activities,” the What is H-Net page notes, “is its sponsorship of over 100 free electronic, interactive newsletters (“lists”) edited by scholars in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, and the Pacific.” The site also includes a database of reviews, a job guide and an announcements page for “academic conferences, calls for papers, and programs… ”

I am particularly fond of the reviews, which are searchable, and provide a helpful way to find ideas and to start to dig through the vast mountain of scholarly books and articles published each year. You can find the most recent reviews and information on the home page or go here to the content search page. It’s not fancy, but it works.

The Economics of Same-Sex Marriage

Legalizing marriage for same-sex couples in New York would have impacts beyond allowing individuals to make the full legal commitments to their partners that opposite sex couples take for granted. Marriage equality would provide economic benefits to New York State and New York City, especially in the years immediately following enactment of legislation granting this important civil right. The economic benefits would be derived primarily from the increase in visitors from other states who come to New York for the purpose of marrying or attending weddings.

Legalization of marriage for same-sex couples would also entail costs to businesses. In particular, businesses that offer health insurance to employee spouses would be required to cover same-sex spouses. However, this additional cost would be partially offset because many firms already offer coverage for domestic partners.

from Love Counts: The Economic Benefits of Marriage Equality for New York, Exective Summary.

I was listening to Doug Henwood’s radio show Beyond the News the other day, and he had a great interview with Lee Badgett on the economics of same-sex marriage. (I am always behind; this interview is from June 21, 2007.) It’s not that the legalization of gay marriage would by itself create an economic boom, but neither would it be an enormously expensive proposition, as some have argued.

Henwood interviewed Badgett on the occasion of the publication of a report, “Love Counts,” (caution, the above link goes to a .pdf file) by the New York City Comptroller’s Office. What’s important is the way these cool facts can or should counter the crazy myths spread by that small group that fears this sort of equality. Equality is an not a luxury we can’t afford. Badgett has a charmingly old-fashioned website, where you can find out more about her work, here.