The Revolution of Connectivity

To most people, the word “writing” means words on paper, prose in sentences and paragraphs. And from this perspective, computers (or any technology) are incidental to writing, simply a means of producing it but not actually part of the art of writing. But not to us. Not to folks in the field of rhetoric and composition and especially not to folks in the field of computers and writing. We reject the idea that writing equals style, syntax, coherence, and organization—meaning at the level of the sentence and the paragraph. And we reject the idea that all writing is the same, whether it is produced with a pencil, a typewriter, or a networked computer.

From Kairos 10:1 “Why Teach Digital Writing” by the WIDE Research Collective

I guess I have lived through enough web revolutions to be a little skeptical whenever someone makes sweeping claims for the impact of new technology. Still, the W.R.C. makes a strong case that writing is becoming more complicated and nuanced than ever before, simply because there is more of it in more kinds of media.

The really interesting uses of these new technologies are the mash-ups, clever scripts that combine a variety of different sources of information into useful new forms or formats. Some are general, others very specific. TechPresident, for example, harvests information from all of the social networking sites related to the presidential campaign.

TechPresident has statistics, for example, on which candidate has the most friends in MySpace, or whose videos are watched most often on YouTube.
If you want to spend a few (hours) minutes exploring reviewing the good, the bad, and the ugly among these new web 2.0 tools you can start at Go2Web20.net.

The Eggcorn Database: A Far-Gone Conclusion

foregone » far gone
Chiefly in: far-gone conclusion
Classification: English

Spotted in the wild:

  • Therefore, as far as Fox News is concerned, the guilt of these first to be court-martialed is a far-gone conclusion, in order for their ‘fair and balanced’ agenda to be successful. (ThatColoredFellasWeblog, May 19, 2004)
  • Whenever someone starts comparing the President to Hitler, it is a far-gone conclusion that reason has flown out the window. (Romantic Times forum, January 27, 2005)
  • As a resident, and knowing Illinois politics as I do, it has been a far gone conclusion that this is a very safe Kerry Blue State. (Watchblog, comment, June 10, 2004)
  • I am sure now, that if this were on the general ballot in November, the vote would’ve been much closer, and not a far-gone conclusion. (Watchblog, August 04, 2004)
  • What is only inferred in the article is that the study was based upon the assumption that global warming is a far-gone conclusion. (Slings and Arrows, April 08, 2003)
  • Analyzed or reported by:

    * Ken Lakritz (on this site)

    from the Eggcorn Database

    Eggcorns, the contributers say, “tell us something about how ordinary speakers and writers make sense of the language they use.” They “arise when a writer knows an expression well enough to employ it in an appropriate context, but is mistaken about the term’s or its constituents’ meanings, origins or the underlying metaphors.” The Database now includes just under 600 examples.

    See Jane

    • In the 101 studied films, there are three male characters for every one female character.
    • Fewer than one out of three (28 percent) of the speaking characters (both real and animated) are female.
    • Fewer than one in five (17 percent) of the characters in crowd scenes are female.
    • More than four out of five (83 percent) of the films’ narrators are male.

    from “Where the Girls Aren’t.”

    See Jane

    Here’s one of those things that are so obvious that we have all forgotten about it in our rush to be post-feminist. Movies are fully dominated by men, in several different senses, even if women are increasingly powerful behind the scenes.

    Gina Davis co-founded See Jane last year. “By making it common for our youngest children to see everywhere a balance of active and complex male and female characters,” Davis writes, “girls and boys will grow up to empathize with and care more about each others’ stories.”

    I wonder if this sort of advocacy would have been possible if there were no women in power to listen. Or, perhaps, there will no change of this sort until there is a critical mass of women and men sympathetic to these sorts of issues. Either way, the research SeeJane sponsors is worth a look.