Jeff Tweedy, Mavis Staples, Sean Lennon: “Happy Xmas (War Is Over)”

It’s a good weekend to be a seller at a gun show. Particularly for those hawking assault weapons. As the last child killed in the Dec. 14 school massacre in Newtown, Conn. was laid to rest Saturday, gun enthusiasts across the country waited in long lines and thronged gun show booths in what many openly described as a rush to buy assault weapons out of fear that they could soon be outlawed. Reuters reporters went to gun shows in Pennsylvania, Missouri, and Texas to confirm the trend that is also backed up by local news reports. There was such a rush to get inside a Texas gun show Saturday morning that the Fort Worth Star Telegram says it prompted “comparisons to eager ‘Black Friday shoppers.’”

Gun Shows Packed With Customers Eager To Buy Assault Weapons,” Daniel Politi

The Best for the Rest

Average folks and higher education researchers have conflicting views of academia. Average folks believe that most college teachers are tenured professors and that most students are residential students who play ultimate Frisbee on the quad. Higher education researchers have a different view. We know that most teachers are actually part time adjuncts and graduate students. Residential college is for the top of the pool. Most students are part time commuters or community college students. The mistake that people make is that the most visible forms of higher education (e.g., elite research universities and liberal arts schools) are the most common.

orgtheory by fabiorojas, as quoted by Vanessa Vaile

Here’s the thing. If you take unions, and to a lesser extent, faculty governance, completely out of the picture you end up with a version of higher education that fabiorojas, in this post, calls “the best and the rest.” In other words, you get a system which has fully abandoned the goal of an educated society, and that no longer believes that scientific literacy is crucial to the future of human society. It’s a vision of utter powerlessness.

Instead, you get a system in which, as fabiorojas, says, a small minority of students “want genuine engagement and learning.” It’s expensive, though, and only available to the socioeconomic elite. That’s the best; taught by tenured faculty. The rest get “a credential and some basic vocational instruction.” That can be done on the internet, or at junior colleges, or community colleges, taught largely by adjuncts and graduate students.

I think fabiorojas is wrong on at least two counts. Humans, including teenagers, are seekers, programmed to be curious and interested in knowledge and understanding. If the system made some sort of sense, I think lots of people would choose, at various points in their lives, to immerse themselves in knowledge for a time. I also think the writer is wrong insofar as he or she implies that our current system is a tenable– or even stable– state of affairs.

Democratic culture won’t survive unless we continue to expand intellectual literacy. We can’t make good decisions otherwise; technological culture isn’t going away. In the U.S. fewer than 1/3 of us have undergraduate college degrees; that needs to double and then triple and it needs to happen sooner rather than later. It won’t happen, on or off-line, unless teachers put their own power back into the equations in the form of aggressive, unionized faculties.