Spreading Capitalism

Seattle — Udacity, a company offering free online courses and aiming to bring higher education to the world, will participate in a new global entrepreneurship training program beginning in November. The company will partner with Startup Weekend, TechStars, Startup America and startup guru, Steve Blank, and others to create Startup Weekend Next.

>Udacity Blends Online Course with Offline Education

The Utopian promise of the internet has always been a capitalist promise, a political project in which people could do well by doing the right thing. Poverty would be alleviated not by consciousness raising but by markets. Nothing epitomizes this spirit more than this new Udacity project, called “experiential entrepreneurship education” which combines an online class with a kind of intensive workshop.

I doubt this will jump-start the world economy but I bet it will launch more than a few businesses. This is one of those good ideas that if the Republican Party– supposedly the party of business–had any sense at all, would be one of the pillars of its economic and foreign policy. It might be a struggle to sell this to those middle aged angry white men, but it wouldn’t be impossible. It’d broaden the Republican party’s demographic base too.

This is also one of those projects that those of us interested in substantive change ought to consider carefully and perhaps emulate. If Steve Blank can use online education– or a hybrid education, more precisely– to spread capitalism, what can we use it for? How about an online course and workshop that teaches activism? Perhaps it would be called “Occupy 101.” Or a course in Democratic Socialism, or radical economics or …

The Last Yahoo

By what I could discover, the YAHOOS appear to be the most unteachable of all animals: their capacity never reaching higher than to draw or carry burdens. Yet I am of opinion, this defect arises chiefly from a perverse, restive disposition; for they are cunning, malicious, treacherous, and revengeful. They are strong and hardy, but of a cowardly spirit, and, by consequence, insolent, abject, and cruel.

Gulliver’s Travels, Chapter 35, Jonathon Swift

Second, the country is nowhere near as closely divided as the popular vote indicates. That’s because non-voters, who were about 43% of the electorate in 2008, favor Obama by a margin of about 2.5 to one.

Indeed, the resources and political power that Republicans mobilized in an effort to deny millions of Americans their right to vote, and to suppress voter turnout, raise serious questions about their legitimacy as a political party. A legitimate political party does not rely on preventing citizens from voting, in order to prevail at the polls, any more than a legitimate government relies on repressing freedom of speech or assembly in order to remain in power.

Barack Obama’s carefully crafted economic populism carries the day,” Mark Weisbrot

We’ve said for years— maybe too confidently– that the Republican party is doomed by demographics. Or, rather, that the so-called Southern Strategy is doomed by demographics. There just aren’t enough white people in the U.S. to allow the right-wing to rely on racism to get out the vote. The Bush administration was a bit of an anomaly, allowing the Yahoos to use the fear of terrorism (along with the racism) to get into office.

I think the Tea Party is a similar anomaly, a right-wing populism rushing in to fill the vacuum created by the Democratic party’s timidity. It was bound to fail because the Republican party has little interest in helping working people and will only shrink government if there’s a buck to be made. I’m hoping that someone like Elizabeth Warren and perhaps Sherrod Brown, will keep a populist fire under the Obama administration’s feet.

No one was running the Republican Party this time except the Yahoos like Karl Rove. They’ve convinced themselves that it was their marketing skills, and not the widening income disparity (or 9-11 or two wars) that created the Tea Party and that maintains the Republican stranglehold on the House. This time, at least, the big lies didn’t work. That might be a more important victory than the reelection of the president.

Inconvenient Truths

Three decades ago, non-college white men were solidly Democratic. Many of them were unionized. They had jobs that delivered good middle-class incomes.

But over the last three decades they stopped believing the Democratic Party could deliver good jobs at decent wages.

Republicans have done no better for them on the wages — in fact many policies touted by the GOP, such as its attack on unions, have accelerated the downward wage trend.

But Republicans have offered white non-college males the scapegoats of racism and immigration — blaming, directly or indirectly, blacks and Latinos — and the solace of right-wing evangelical Christianity. Absent any bold leadership from Democrats, these have been enough.

More Jobs, Lousy Wages, and the Desertion of Non-College White Men From the Democratic Party,” Robert Reich

I know a lot of these white men, without college, in low-paying jobs. My family is full of them and, thanks to Facebook, I am in touch with many of my childhood friends, most of whom didn’t go to college. I’d make Reich’s story a little more complicated. We were raised in Texas, where there are few unions. Texas, though, is on the bleeding edge of racial relationships in every direction. In some ways geography is destiny.

There’s the obvious tensions along the Mexican border. Or, rather, two borders; the political border, along the Rio Grande, doesn’t match the cultural border, which cuts across the lower third of Texas. Texas isn’t just Western, or Southwestern, though, it’s also Southern, and so divided by Black and White as well. So in Texas it is easy to imagine the ways that the right has used race to divide the working class against itself.

Most of my friends back in Texas didn’t abandon the Democratic party, though; they never entered it in the first place. Somehow, as they grew up, they grew into reactionary politics, despite the fact that we were all nascent liberals in Junior High and High School. At some moment, or over the course of time, perhaps in the 1980’s, something switched. I honestly don’t know how the right and its narrow-mindedness came to seem so appealing.

I suspect that a big part of it has to do with a kind of resentment of professionals and technocratic, scientific culture. Obama isn’t just hated because he’s Black, he’s hated because he’s so well-educated. The enemy is the professor as much as the community organizer, those know it all overpaid egg-heads. The Democratic party represents a meritocratic ideal that’s only half real at best. Hard work often doesn’t pay. People resent that lie.