Deconstructing Education

Millions of learners have enjoyed the free lecture videos and other course materials published online through the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s OpenCourseWare project. Now MIT plans to release a fresh batch of open online courses—and, for the first time, to offer certificates to outside students who complete them.

MIT Will Offer Certificates”  Marc Parry

We’ve become so sentimental about universities– if not delusional— that we forget that the entire point of the higher education system was to control knowledge, or, better, to carefully regulate the cultural capital of the middle class.  It was a classic Goldilocks problem: if higher education was too restricted, you can’t run your high-tech economy, if it’s too open, you risk  what H. Bruce Franklin  once called an educated proletariat.

After WWII million of  people got access to a higher education– my father among them– who would normally have been locked out via the G.I. Bill. At some point, though, arguably in the late 1960s or early 1970s, the porridge got a little too cool, and so the pendulum began to swing back, shutting down access or restricting what the educated could do by forcing them into debts that border on indentured servitude.

MIT’s certificates are a rare moment of long-term thinking in the ruling classes.  The first step to change in higher education is to break the university’s monopoly on knowledge. That why open courses and open source is so important. The second, and perhaps more important step, is to institutionalize the time and energy invested in this form of learning so it can circulate as  cultural capital. That’s what MIT has begun.

Juxtaposition and Critical Thinking

Continental European capitalism, which combines generous health and social benefits with reasonable working hours, long vacation periods, early retirement, and relatively equal income distributions, would seem to have everything to recommend it – except sustainability.

Is Modern Capitalism Sustainable“– Kenneth Rogoff

Mike Konczal assembles some striking quotes from Federal Reserve transcripts showing how obsessed the monetary overlords are with keeping wages down. I won’t recycle any of the quotes—check out his post for the full flavor.

The Fed and the Class Struggle” — Doug Henwood

Here’s an juxtaposition that might be used to teach critical thinking. The contrast between these two ways of seeing the economy isn’t simply a matter of right and wrong, yes and no, or even “subject positions,” although that certainly has a role.  Rogoff is an academic at Harvard and a former IMF economist.  It’s in his self-interest to support capitalism, of course, since he has so much riding on it.  He’s no apologist though and he’s in a bleak mood. Henwood’s successful too, but far outside the academic charmed circle.

What’s interesting is that Rogoff seems at a loss for words when it comes to the crisis undergoing capitalism. The most generous forms, he says, without any explanation, are “unsustainable.” Reading Henwood next to Rogoff gives us a sense of the reality behind the assertion.  No market is going to create what Rogoff calls “a better balance between equality and efficiency.”  Once we pull back the curtain, it’s the political struggle over resources–aka the class struggle– that lies at the hear our current problems and our hope of any solution.

An Empire of Nonsense

We could write a history of the last 30 years as a history of rising gullibility. It ought to concern all of us who teach, since it’s the exact opposite of critical thinking. It might begin with that amiable old con man Reagan, who never seemed in any way believable but who was sold as the epitome of the effective politician. That’s when the gap between what we saw with our own eyes and what was being said widened.

It’s been on my mind because of the rise of Newt Gingrich, whose career marks a key turning point between the delusional but somehow gentile lies of the Reagan era and the wildly unbelievable lies of the current time. Reagan and his ilk told us that if we give our money to the rich it will come floating back down to us like manna from heaven;  Michele Bachmann suspects FEMA is setting up concentration camps.

The real question is how the right has managed to successfully use the nonsense of supply side economics as a kind of foundation for an entire empire of nonsense that huge numbers of people find persuasive. It’s an ethos based gullibility, a belief that if the (right) person in authority says something it must be true, combined with a certain palette of pathos appeals, from fear to anger to paranoia and victimization.