writinginthewild.com

"nothing natural about it!"

  • Home
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Teaching Materials
    • How to Succeed in an Online Writing Class: Plan, Revise, Discuss
    • Open Source and Free Software for Students
    • Policies for Advanced Composition
    • Bibliography Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Syllabus for Professional Writing
    • Local Information for Coles County, Illinios
    • Oral Report Assignment for Professional Writing
    • Peer Critique Assignment for Professional Writing
    • Reading Charts
    • Resume/Cover Letter for Introduction to Professional Writing
    • Self-Commentaries
  • Sitemap
  • About
RSS

Save Heroes

Posted on November 26, 2007 by Ray Watkins
Comments off

We need to write a detailed critique of the plot, character, race and gender elements of Heroes. We need to have one place where the producers and writers of Heroes can come and find what fandom has to say on these issues.

That’s the purpose of this website. We don’t need to Save Heroes from cancellation or network misuse, we need to Save Heroes from itself. Because it’s not a lost cause. It’s still capable of being the amazing show it was in season one. No, it’s capable of being even better.

How can you help Save Heroes? Easy. Just give your opinion on the Plot and Characters or Race and Gender issues in the show. We’re inviting all fans to contribute to a collaborative document in which we provide constructive, respectful criticism of the current season. Whether you offer your original thoughts or point to existing posts on the Internet, all ideas are welcome. Once we have enough contributions to create a coherent document, we’ll put it together in total and digitally sign it.

from Save Heroes, A Collaborative Fan Effort to Save a Great Show

I enjoy reading The Angry Black Women and I was happy to see this post, in which she announces the launching of her Save Heroes project. There seem to be two main motivations. First, the show has simply gotten worse this season. I could not agree more and apparently even the creator, Tim Kring, thinks they made some serious mistakes.

More interesting is the attempt to create a collaborative analysis of the show’s portrayal of race, and gender in U.S. culture and to offer progressive alternatives. There’s sections on plot, character, race and gender, and a timeline. Since the writers are on strike, SH notes, they “can’t create any new Heroes scripts. That makes this the perfect time to present them with our thoughts, so they can keep them in mind moving forward.”

It seems to be working, at least in terms of collecting interesting comments. At this point the gender commentary is focusing on the array of passive girlfriends and women ‘who can’t control their powers.’ In the race commentary, one reader provides statistics illustrating the various biases of the show. There are 27 total characters, 10 women and 17 men; 13 are non-white (Black: 7 (26%), Latino: 5 (19%), biracial: 1 (4%)) and 14 white (52%).

It will be fascinating to see if they succeed at helping to create a show that is both progressive and fun. I think one of the strengths of the show, especially in the first season, was that it had so many types of characters. The criticism, of course, is that the many types tended to fall into predictable stereotypes. There is nothing in the idea of the show that would make that necessary, of course. It’s unfortunate they can’t hire Octavia Butler as a writer and consultant.

Amplify

Categories: Miscellaneous, Online Places, Writing
Notice: This work is licensed under a BY-NC-SA. Permalink: Save Heroes
Save the GOP from Socialism
Growing Up in the Universe

  • Share this Article

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1 other subscriber

  • View James Ray Watkins's profile on LinkedIn
  • Book Cover Image

    Get my book at Southern Illinois University Press, Amazon, or Powell's Books.

     

    The C.C.C.C webpage, A Taste for Language: Literacy, Class, and English Studies includes a short podcast interview with me along with links to these reviews:

    ... by Victor Villanueva in CCC 62.4 (June 2011)
    ... by Chanon Adsanatham in Teaching English in the Two-Year College 38.3 (March 2011)
    ... by Scott McLemee in Inside Higher Education (17 Feb 2010)

    Note: you need to be a member of NCTE, and a subscriber to the relevant journal, to read the reviews by Villanueva and Adsanatham; the review by McLemee is available to the general public.

  • Reading

    • 'Change.edu' and the Problem With For-Profits - Commentary - The Chronicle of Higher Education 2012/02/01
    • Jonathan Franzen: E-readers are 'damaging to society' - CSMonitor.com 2012/01/31
    • The Time is Now: Report from the New Faculty Majority Summit | Inside Higher Ed 2012/01/31
    • MIT Mints a Valuable New Form of Academic Currency - Commentary - The Chronicle of Higher Education 2012/01/26
  • Recent Comments

    • Irais on Corruption Studies, University Sports Division
    • Merle Carthens on Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Hellen Wright on Bibliography Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Queens Studio Cleaning Service on Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • email cover letter on Reading Charts
  • Links

  • Categories

  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
© writinginthewild.com. Proudly Powered by WordPress | Nest Theme by YChong