writinginthewild.com

"nothing natural about it!"

  • Home
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Teaching Materials
    • How to Succeed in an Online Writing Class: Plan, Revise, Discuss
    • Open Source and Free Software for Students
    • Policies for Advanced Composition
    • Bibliography Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Syllabus for Professional Writing
    • Local Information for Coles County, Illinios
    • Oral Report Assignment for Professional Writing
    • Peer Critique Assignment for Professional Writing
    • Reading Charts
    • Resume/Cover Letter for Introduction to Professional Writing
    • Self-Commentaries
  • Sitemap
  • About
RSS

Are You Better Off in 2008 Than You Were in 2000?

Posted on September 29, 2008 by Ray Watkins
Comments off

Washington, DC- During the final presidential debate of the 1980 election, Ronald Reagan, running against Jimmy Carter, turned to the camera and asked “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” The debate took place against a backdrop of spiraling inflation and rising unemployment. A week later, Reagan won the election by one of the largest margins in recent history. Now, with the 2008 presidential election just weeks away and the economy once again in turmoil, a new report from the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) updates the Reagan question by comparing economic indicators in 2008 and 2000, and finds that most indicators suggest that voters are worse off now than they were eight years ago.

CEPR – Are You Better Off in 2008 Than You Were in 2000?.

Over the last two weeks my relatives have been sending out email to the informal family email groups relating to recent financial news. I was particularly shocked by one email which claimed that the Democrats had to be held responsible, since the original bank deregulation bill was the work of President Clinton. (Here’s President Clinton’s opinion on that issue.)

It’s a half truth at best because since that bill the Republican Party has had eight years to revise and regulate wherever necessary. They didn’t because they don’t believe in regulation on principal. That cannot really be argued. McCain has voted against the minimum wage as intrusive regulation at least 19 times (he voted for it a few years ago).

I keep thinking that information, like the Center for Economic Policy Research, is the key to convincing my larger family that their faith in markets is wrong. I am not sure that this will do any good. It seems to me that the issue here is similar to rooting for your team, not making a rational choice. I am not sure how much of the What’s Wrong with Kansas thesis I buy, but something strange is going on here.

Why would they consistently vote against their own economic interests? It sounds superficial, but at some point something happened that made many of family feel some connection to the Republicans, just like they might feel some connection to the New Orleans Saints or the UT Longhorns. They stick to it, no matter what happens; in fact, not sticking to your time when times are bad is disloyalty of the worst sort.

Amplify

Categories: Writing
Notice: This work is licensed under a BY-NC-SA. Permalink: Are You Better Off in 2008 Than You Were in 2000?
Five Years Time
One Sentence

  • Share this Article

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1 other subscriber

  • View James Ray Watkins's profile on LinkedIn
  • Book Cover Image

    Get my book at Southern Illinois University Press, Amazon, or Powell's Books.

     

    The C.C.C.C webpage, A Taste for Language: Literacy, Class, and English Studies includes a short podcast interview with me along with links to these reviews:

    ... by Victor Villanueva in CCC 62.4 (June 2011)
    ... by Chanon Adsanatham in Teaching English in the Two-Year College 38.3 (March 2011)
    ... by Scott McLemee in Inside Higher Education (17 Feb 2010)

    Note: you need to be a member of NCTE, and a subscriber to the relevant journal, to read the reviews by Villanueva and Adsanatham; the review by McLemee is available to the general public.

  • Reading

    • Temple U. Project Ditches Textbooks for Homemade Digital Alternatives - Wired Campus - The Chronicle of Higher Education 2012/02/08
    • 'Change.edu' and the Problem With For-Profits - Commentary - The Chronicle of Higher Education 2012/02/01
    • Jonathan Franzen: E-readers are 'damaging to society' - CSMonitor.com 2012/01/31
    • The Time is Now: Report from the New Faculty Majority Summit | Inside Higher Ed 2012/01/31
  • Recent Comments

    • Irais on Corruption Studies, University Sports Division
    • Merle Carthens on Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Hellen Wright on Bibliography Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Queens Studio Cleaning Service on Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • email cover letter on Reading Charts
  • Links

  • Categories

  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
© writinginthewild.com. Proudly Powered by WordPress | Nest Theme by YChong