-
Search
-

Get my book at Southern Illinois University Press, The NCTE, Barnes and Noble, Amazon, Powell's Books, Politics and Prose, or Square Books.
Reading
- Splitting the Difference on Gainful Employment
- Why Do You Think They're Called For-Profit Colleges?
- Is UC regent's vision for higher education clouded by his investments?
- Serving the University: Better Mentors for Young Professors Would Help
- 'Somewhere a Dog Barked'
- Will the U.S. Have Zero Black Senators in 2011?
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
-
Links
-
Archives
- ► 2010
- 7July 2010 (13)
- June 2010 (13)
- May 2010 (13)
- April 2010 (13)
- March 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (12)
- January 2010 (13)
- ► 2009
- December 2009 (11)
- November 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (13)
- September 2009 (13)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (13)
- May 2009 (13)
- April 2009 (13)
- March 2009 (13)
- February 2009 (12)
- January 2009 (13)
- ► 2008
- December 2008 (14)
- November 2008 (12)
- October 2008 (14)
- September 2008 (13)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (13)
- April 2008 (13)
- March 2008 (13)
- February 2008 (13)
- January 2008 (13)
- ► 2007
- December 2007 (12)
- November 2007 (13)
- October 2007 (14)
- September 2007 (13)
- August 2007 (14)
- July 2007 (10)
- June 2007 (13)
- May 2007 (12)
- April 2007 (13)
- March 2007 (13)
- February 2007 (12)
- January 2007 (14)
- ► 2006
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (14)
- October 2006 (12)
- September 2006 (8)
- ► 2010
-
RSS Links
-
Meta
Sarah Palin’s (Empty) Rhetorical Style
Governor Palin reminds me of a boss I once had. He was good looking, always ready with a smile, and on the surface supportive and helpful. He seemed the ideal academic administrator. Over the course of several years, however, the bright surface seemed more and more like a flashing mirror distracting you from his real goals. He demanded total control over his little kingdom.
Eventually, I came to realize that he was a profoundly immoral human being; a particular type of tyrant that is all too common. I don’t think you can call him manipulative in any substantive sense, because the link between appearance, the public face, and the private power, the authoritarian control, is so close. It’s what success looked and felt like to him: to be powerful is to fool people.
He did some awful things, too, ruining lives in both petty and serious ways and undermining the ability of teachers to do their jobs. He could never be held responsible, though, because on the one hand he had that smiling face, and on the other hand he had a gun under his coat and he was not afraid to use it. We all thought he would certainly become a dean.
My partner is livid that Palin is the “type” that now represents successful women– successful politics– to so many. It particularly galls her that so few seem to even want to try to see behind the flashing mirrors; it’s as if the substance is irrelevant, and nothing matters but the performance. We point out the wink, but then, in effect, we wink in return: isn’t that adorable!
It’s exactly like my old boss. In fact, I think we in academia have had a hand in promoting a way of thinking, so well represented by the Washington Post article, that empties out the content of rhetorical analysis. Maybe it’s because it’s so important to a successful career in the American university. There’s ugliness behind that cute little nose wrinkle, though, and we ignore it at our peril.