writinginthewild.com

"nothing natural about it!"

  • Home
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Teaching Materials
    • How to Succeed in an Online Writing Class: Plan, Revise, Discuss
    • Open Source and Free Software for Students
    • Policies for Advanced Composition
    • Bibliography Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Syllabus for Professional Writing
    • Local Information for Coles County, Illinios
    • Oral Report Assignment for Professional Writing
    • Peer Critique Assignment for Professional Writing
    • Reading Charts
    • Resume/Cover Letter for Introduction to Professional Writing
    • Self-Commentaries
  • Sitemap
  • About
RSS

It Sucks to be Poor

Posted on November 24, 2008 by Ray Watkins
Comments off

PITTSBURGH—Although state lotteries, on average, return just 53 cents for every dollar spent on a ticket, people continue to pour money into them — especially low-income people, who spend a larger percentage of their incomes on lottery tickets than do the wealthier segments of society. A new Carnegie Mellon University study sheds light on the reasons why low-income lottery players eagerly invest in a product that provides poor returns.

In the study, published in the July issue of the Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, participants who were made to feel subjectively poor bought nearly twice as many lottery tickets as a comparison group that was made to feel subjectively more affluent. The Carnegie Mellon findings point to poverty’s central role in people’s decisions to buy lottery tickets.

“Some poor people see playing the lottery as their best opportunity for improving their financial situations, albeit wrongly so,” said the study’s lead author Emily Haisley, a doctoral student in the Department of Organizational Behavior and Theory at Carnegie Mellon’s Tepper School of Business. “The hope of getting out of poverty encourages people to continue to buy tickets, even though their chances of stumbling upon a life-changing windfall are nearly impossibly slim and buying lottery tickets in fact exacerbates the very poverty that purchasers are hoping to escape.”

July 24: Carnegie Mellon Study Uncovers Why Low-Income People Buy Lottery Tickets – Carnegie Mellon University.

I don’t mean to be facetious, because this is very important research into what has become an almost violently regressive form of taxation, but in the end what it says is simple: it sucks to be poor. The lottery is particularly sinister, too, because it has often been sold as a way to help the poor through better funding of the public schools. This is another legacy of conservative politics.

The money has only rarely (if ever) used to help schools, of course. I am hoping that in the near future we will look back on this and think: trying to raise tax money through a lottery was both stupid and cruel. My inner cynic is especially skeptical, though, because lotteries have been so well marketed that their image of harmless fun will be difficult if not impossible to change.

Amplify

Categories: Economics, Writing
Notice: This work is licensed under a BY-NC-SA. Permalink: It Sucks to be Poor
John Doe, Kathleen Edwards: “We’ll Sweep Out the Ashes”
High-Skill Educations

  • Share this Article

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1 other subscriber

  • View James Ray Watkins's profile on LinkedIn
  • Book Cover Image

    Get my book at Southern Illinois University Press, Amazon, or Powell's Books.

     

    The C.C.C.C webpage, A Taste for Language: Literacy, Class, and English Studies includes a short podcast interview with me along with links to these reviews:

    ... by Victor Villanueva in CCC 62.4 (June 2011)
    ... by Chanon Adsanatham in Teaching English in the Two-Year College 38.3 (March 2011)
    ... by Scott McLemee in Inside Higher Education (17 Feb 2010)

    Note: you need to be a member of NCTE, and a subscriber to the relevant journal, to read the reviews by Villanueva and Adsanatham; the review by McLemee is available to the general public.

  • Reading

    • 'Change.edu' and the Problem With For-Profits - Commentary - The Chronicle of Higher Education 2012/02/01
    • Jonathan Franzen: E-readers are 'damaging to society' - CSMonitor.com 2012/01/31
    • The Time is Now: Report from the New Faculty Majority Summit | Inside Higher Ed 2012/01/31
    • MIT Mints a Valuable New Form of Academic Currency - Commentary - The Chronicle of Higher Education 2012/01/26
  • Recent Comments

    • Irais on Corruption Studies, University Sports Division
    • Merle Carthens on Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Hellen Wright on Bibliography Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Queens Studio Cleaning Service on Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • email cover letter on Reading Charts
  • Links

  • Categories

  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
© writinginthewild.com. Proudly Powered by WordPress | Nest Theme by YChong