-
Search
-

Get my book at Southern Illinois University Press, The NCTE, Barnes and Noble, Amazon, Powell's Books, Politics and Prose, or Square Books.
Reading
- Splitting the Difference on Gainful Employment
- Why Do You Think They're Called For-Profit Colleges?
- Is UC regent's vision for higher education clouded by his investments?
- Serving the University: Better Mentors for Young Professors Would Help
- 'Somewhere a Dog Barked'
- Will the U.S. Have Zero Black Senators in 2011?
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
-
Links
-
Archives
- ► 2010
- 7July 2010 (13)
- June 2010 (13)
- May 2010 (13)
- April 2010 (13)
- March 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (12)
- January 2010 (13)
- ► 2009
- December 2009 (11)
- November 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (13)
- September 2009 (13)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (13)
- May 2009 (13)
- April 2009 (13)
- March 2009 (13)
- February 2009 (12)
- January 2009 (13)
- ► 2008
- December 2008 (14)
- November 2008 (12)
- October 2008 (14)
- September 2008 (13)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (13)
- April 2008 (13)
- March 2008 (13)
- February 2008 (13)
- January 2008 (13)
- ► 2007
- December 2007 (12)
- November 2007 (13)
- October 2007 (14)
- September 2007 (13)
- August 2007 (14)
- July 2007 (10)
- June 2007 (13)
- May 2007 (12)
- April 2007 (13)
- March 2007 (13)
- February 2007 (12)
- January 2007 (14)
- ► 2006
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (14)
- October 2006 (12)
- September 2006 (8)
- ► 2010
-
RSS Links
-
Meta
Bourgeois Economics
It sounds like standard vulgar Marxist criticism, but this sort of faux economic talk does no one any good at all. It’s not just the awful sentimentality of the ‘it’s a home, not just a house’ variety, although that is bad enough. It’s the pig-headed insistence that the solution to our economic problems, and by implication the origins, lie in individual discipline, or the lack there-of.
It seems only logical to assume that the savings rate must be related to several structural factors, all beyond the control of any individual. Wages, to start, have not exactly been climbing in the last thirty years or so. The ‘Second Gilded Age” initiated by Reagan’s “Morning in America” promoted hyper-consumption as the highest value. Then you have those pesky medical bills.
What we need is strengthened organized labor and higher wages, national health care, and a vigilante government regulation system. The entire point of the current system is to insulate capital from its own excesses by neutralizing the checks and balances in a democracy. It’s capital, not labor, that needs the ‘tough discipline’ of markets designed to meet human need.