-
Search
-

Get my book at Southern Illinois University Press, The NCTE, Barnes and Noble, Amazon, Powell's Books, Politics and Prose, or Square Books.
Reading
- Exclusive: Manufacturing Dissent at the Education Management Corporation
- “Program for Change: 2010-2030″ (A Proposal for Discussion)
- OK Go on net neutrality: A lesson from the music industry
- Typical Earnings in Distance Learning
- University Attendance Scanners Make Some Uneasy
- Tech gadgets are must-have school supplies
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
-
Links
-
Archives
- ► 2010
- 9September 2010 (2)
- August 2010 (13)
- July 2010 (13)
- June 2010 (13)
- May 2010 (13)
- April 2010 (13)
- March 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (12)
- January 2010 (13)
- ► 2009
- December 2009 (11)
- November 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (13)
- September 2009 (13)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (13)
- May 2009 (13)
- April 2009 (13)
- March 2009 (13)
- February 2009 (12)
- January 2009 (13)
- ► 2008
- December 2008 (14)
- November 2008 (12)
- October 2008 (14)
- September 2008 (13)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (13)
- April 2008 (13)
- March 2008 (13)
- February 2008 (13)
- January 2008 (13)
- ► 2007
- December 2007 (12)
- November 2007 (13)
- October 2007 (14)
- September 2007 (13)
- August 2007 (14)
- July 2007 (10)
- June 2007 (13)
- May 2007 (12)
- April 2007 (13)
- March 2007 (13)
- February 2007 (12)
- January 2007 (14)
- ► 2006
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (14)
- October 2006 (12)
- September 2006 (8)
- ► 2010
-
RSS Links
-
Meta
How Change Happens
Step by step, we are creating a new education system without any sense of where we are going. The outlines of the new system have begun to become a little clearer, however. Much of this change is dependent on historical timing. There was the internet boom, which led to the dot-com crash, and then the housing boom. This created a new sort of infrastructure fed by an Utopian ideology that said these technologies ought to be in every home and classroom.
The internet boom jump-started the internet infrastructure, and the collapse of that bubble fed the housing boom, which bought everyone enough time to get these technologies to the point where their effects cannot be reversed. Utopia got us over the rough spots. Now that the housing bubble has burst, dragging the entire economy with it, more people will take advantage of the new infrastructure to use education to improve their chances on the job market, once the bust plays itself out.
All of this is just the public theater of change; behind the scenes, more profound transformations are taking place. As a profession and a public service, higher education has become lopsidedly bifurcated. An increasingly small minority have what was once a relatively secure position in full-time, tenure track positions. The majority do not. Similarly, the old liberal arts model of education threatens to become the privileged experience of a minority.
I understand the funding concerns but I don’t think this is a funding problem. if something is a priority– say, a bank or auto bail out– the money is available. The real questions have to do with the nature of jobs and job security and with the purposes of education. Conservative ideology has made the notion of job security seem antiquated. That magical force, “the market” has supposedly made such a thing impossible. Why should professors be any different?
And technology, rather than education in the old liberal arts mode, has the Utopian edge that pushes people into long term commitments and projects. Don’t get me wrong. I make my living teaching on the internet and I can see the reality of how these new infrastructure has made a certain kind of education more accessible. I worry, though, that as we are busily trying to get through this recession we are normalizing some deep cuts in our expectations.