writinginthewild.com

"nothing natural about it!"

  • Home
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Teaching Materials
    • How to Succeed in an Online Writing Class: Plan, Revise, Discuss
    • Open Source and Free Software for Students
    • Policies for Advanced Composition
    • Bibliography Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Syllabus for Professional Writing
    • Local Information for Coles County, Illinios
    • Oral Report Assignment for Professional Writing
    • Peer Critique Assignment for Professional Writing
    • Reading Charts
    • Resume/Cover Letter for Introduction to Professional Writing
    • Self-Commentaries
  • Sitemap
  • About
RSS

Lies, Lies, and Damn Lies

Posted on September 14, 2009 by Ray Watkins
Comments off

When critics question the validity of the calculations U.S. News & World Report uses to rank colleges, one answer the editors of the magazine have given is to note that it publishes not only the total rank, but also data on how colleges perform in the various categories that go into the rankings. So a prospective student who cares more about faculty resources or competitiveness or any other factor can see how colleges do there, and judge accordingly.

But if the factor that would-be students and their families care about is a percentage of full-time faculty, you can’t count on the numbers about research universities to be correct. The two universities with the top scores in this category (both claiming 100 percent full-time faculty) have both acknowledged to Inside Higher Ed that they do not include adjunct faculty members in their calculations. U.S. News maintains that colleges do count adjuncts (or are told to) so that figure gives a true sense of the percentage of faculty members who are full time. But the two with 100 percent claims are not alone in boosting their numbers by leaving adjuncts out.

Calculation That Doesn’t Add UpScott Jaschik, September 13, 2009, Chronicle of Higher Education

Two myths dominate the public view of Universities in the U.S.: the myth of the liberal university and the myth of the powerful professor. Part of the problem is that extreme right wing ideas have become so normal-sounding. If a university teaches evolution, or does research into stem cells, it must be liberal. But universities are extremely conservative by nature, if not tradition-bound; as the cliche goes, battleships don’t change direction easily or quickly.

Another measure of their conservative nature is the way universities treat their employees. Slowly, quietly, step by step, institutions of higher education are pulling apart the profession of college professor, dismantling it into what they often call more “flexible” pieces. No job-security, no academic freedom of speech. That brings us to the myth of the powerful professor. In the fairy-tale view, these (always liberal) professors are free to teach what they want, if they teach at all, and cannot be fired.

The American Federation of Teachers and the Chronicle of Higher Education’s responses to the U.S. News and World Report’s college rankings begin to put the lie to that last story. In fact most college teachers are not tenured, much less tenure track. And because the professors are not well-organized, they have so far been unable to stop the ongoing dismantling of their profession. Of course, this is also what happened to auto-workers, and steel workers, and…

Amplify

Categories: Writing
Notice: This work is licensed under a BY-NC-SA. Permalink: Lies, Lies, and Damn Lies
Megafaun– Beloved Binge/The Process
Can Flat World Save the Commercial Textbook?

  • Share this Article

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1 other subscriber

  • View James Ray Watkins's profile on LinkedIn
  • Book Cover Image

    Get my book at Southern Illinois University Press, Amazon, or Powell's Books.

     

    The C.C.C.C webpage, A Taste for Language: Literacy, Class, and English Studies includes a short podcast interview with me along with links to these reviews:

    ... by Victor Villanueva in CCC 62.4 (June 2011)
    ... by Chanon Adsanatham in Teaching English in the Two-Year College 38.3 (March 2011)
    ... by Scott McLemee in Inside Higher Education (17 Feb 2010)

    Note: you need to be a member of NCTE, and a subscriber to the relevant journal, to read the reviews by Villanueva and Adsanatham; the review by McLemee is available to the general public.

  • Reading

    • 'Change.edu' and the Problem With For-Profits - Commentary - The Chronicle of Higher Education 2012/02/01
    • Jonathan Franzen: E-readers are 'damaging to society' - CSMonitor.com 2012/01/31
    • The Time is Now: Report from the New Faculty Majority Summit | Inside Higher Ed 2012/01/31
    • MIT Mints a Valuable New Form of Academic Currency - Commentary - The Chronicle of Higher Education 2012/01/26
  • Recent Comments

    • Irais on Corruption Studies, University Sports Division
    • Merle Carthens on Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Hellen Wright on Bibliography Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • Queens Studio Cleaning Service on Family Literacy Assignment for Freshman Composition
    • email cover letter on Reading Charts
  • Links

  • Categories

  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
© writinginthewild.com. Proudly Powered by WordPress | Nest Theme by YChong