-
Search
-

Get my book at Southern Illinois University Press, The NCTE, Barnes and Noble, Amazon, Powell's Books, Politics and Prose, or Square Books.
Reading
- Splitting the Difference on Gainful Employment
- Why Do You Think They're Called For-Profit Colleges?
- Is UC regent's vision for higher education clouded by his investments?
- Serving the University: Better Mentors for Young Professors Would Help
- 'Somewhere a Dog Barked'
- Will the U.S. Have Zero Black Senators in 2011?
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
-
Links
-
Archives
- ► 2010
- 7July 2010 (13)
- June 2010 (13)
- May 2010 (13)
- April 2010 (13)
- March 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (12)
- January 2010 (13)
- ► 2009
- December 2009 (11)
- November 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (13)
- September 2009 (13)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (13)
- May 2009 (13)
- April 2009 (13)
- March 2009 (13)
- February 2009 (12)
- January 2009 (13)
- ► 2008
- December 2008 (14)
- November 2008 (12)
- October 2008 (14)
- September 2008 (13)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (13)
- April 2008 (13)
- March 2008 (13)
- February 2008 (13)
- January 2008 (13)
- ► 2007
- December 2007 (12)
- November 2007 (13)
- October 2007 (14)
- September 2007 (13)
- August 2007 (14)
- July 2007 (10)
- June 2007 (13)
- May 2007 (12)
- April 2007 (13)
- March 2007 (13)
- February 2007 (12)
- January 2007 (14)
- ► 2006
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (14)
- October 2006 (12)
- September 2006 (8)
- ► 2010
-
RSS Links
-
Meta
Cultural Capital at the Top
My educated guess is that the class divide that seems to have become so normalized economically is going to become ever more sharply reflected in the cultural capital of education. I think this will first happen in the institutional capital of universities, particularly in the way they represent learning. These new emerging class divisions will turn on technology.
More and more, I think, online education will come to be seen as analogous to the large lecture halls of the public research universities and the community colleges. That is, as cost and labor saving techniques by and large inappropriate to the higher reaches of the hierarchy. Elite institutions will use distance education, but only as a supplement to their experiential pedagogy.
It won’t be perfectly clear cut– what social phenomena ever is? — but increasingly the class divide will be reflected in the relative pedagogical weight of experiential, ‘hands on’ education, and distance education. At the top, cultural capital will be accumulated in small workshop seminars and in various forms of professional collaboration; at the bottom, via online courses.
I think you get a hint of this in Yale’s ongoing attempt to redefine its Architecture program to reflect what the American Institute of Architecture Students calls “a culture of optimism, respect, sharing, engagement and innovation” (“New Blueprint for Architecture” Inside Higher Ed, October 19, 2009). The reforms are understandably oriented towards undoing the old “work until you drop” model.
That’s a good thing, no doubt. Most subtlety, though, the changes all seem to suggest an emphasis on the sorts of educational work that can only be accomplished in person. “Students will be able to spend a semester in New York City taking courses,” says Dagmar Ritcher, architecture chair, “working at internships and “networking with alumni who are very active in practice there.”
As an online teacher I have to be concerned about the ways that new communication technologies tend to magnify, not simply reproduce, socioeconomic inequity. I think we can teach writing online as well as the traditional classroom. More and more, though, elite institutions will distinguish themselves by the social cultural capital we cannot provide our students at a distance.