-
Search
-

Get my book at Southern Illinois University Press, The NCTE, Barnes and Noble, Amazon, Powell's Books, Politics and Prose, or Square Books.
Reading
- Splitting the Difference on Gainful Employment
- Why Do You Think They're Called For-Profit Colleges?
- Is UC regent's vision for higher education clouded by his investments?
- Serving the University: Better Mentors for Young Professors Would Help
- 'Somewhere a Dog Barked'
- Will the U.S. Have Zero Black Senators in 2011?
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
-
Links
-
Archives
- ► 2010
- 7July 2010 (13)
- June 2010 (13)
- May 2010 (13)
- April 2010 (13)
- March 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (12)
- January 2010 (13)
- ► 2009
- December 2009 (11)
- November 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (13)
- September 2009 (13)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (13)
- May 2009 (13)
- April 2009 (13)
- March 2009 (13)
- February 2009 (12)
- January 2009 (13)
- ► 2008
- December 2008 (14)
- November 2008 (12)
- October 2008 (14)
- September 2008 (13)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (13)
- April 2008 (13)
- March 2008 (13)
- February 2008 (13)
- January 2008 (13)
- ► 2007
- December 2007 (12)
- November 2007 (13)
- October 2007 (14)
- September 2007 (13)
- August 2007 (14)
- July 2007 (10)
- June 2007 (13)
- May 2007 (12)
- April 2007 (13)
- March 2007 (13)
- February 2007 (12)
- January 2007 (14)
- ► 2006
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (14)
- October 2006 (12)
- September 2006 (8)
- ► 2010
-
RSS Links
-
Meta
More Sentimental Education
I’ve long wanted to write about the notion of individual instruction, which I think is a harmful myth, a kind of nostalgia for something that never existed. It’s a scary thing to examine, though, simply because so many teachers hold this myth so close to their pedagogical hearts. This week provides an interesting case in point, in the form of a blog entry by Margate Soltan at Inside Higher Ed’s “University Diaries” (“Professormatronic“). Once agin the impersonal culprit is technology.
In this case, the idea of individual instruction arises from a discussion of a student complaint that professors no longer write on papers by hand. It’s very tempting to simply repeat Derrida’s famous deconstruction of the individuality of the signature, but I don’t think it’s necessary to go that far. I would like to know if the student had experienced this “personal” handwriting before, or if this was simply an idea he or she had about handwriting. My guess is that there are lots of people out there who remember the sharp sting of red ink.
I don’t have any complaints about the idea that students benefit from feeling that they have their professor’s full attention, at least briefly. If you ask a question, well, you want a good answer. I can’t see much practical differance between a professor and student pouring over a written paper, or a student and profesor pouring over a paper on the laptop. Much of this piece, though, seems to sentimentalize the technology of a few decades ago. (See this piece on the myths of online education, too.)
Ironically, the technology bemoaned by Soltan is attractive exactly becuase it’s a tool that many feel (perhaps naively) counters the alienation of U.S. culture by facilitating authentic connections. The myth of individual instruction wrongly sugests to students that because all people are unique, their learning is unique. Learning is social though, not individual; we share more than we differ. That should be a source of strength. Human relationships are the root cause of any alienation, educational or otherwise, not technology.