Encyclopedia of Earth

Welcome to the Encyclopedia of Earth, a new electronic reference about the Earth, its natural environments, and their interaction with society. The Encyclopedia is a free, fully searchable collection of articles written by scholars, professionals, educators, and experts who collaborate and review each other’s work. The articles are written in non-technical language and will be useful to students, educators, scholars, professionals, as well as to the general public.

About the EoE

Here’s another of those projects that make all of the Utopian claims about the Internet seem realistic. The Encyclopedia is actually one part of what is called the Earth Portal, which includes the Earth Forum and the Earth News.

Earth Forum includes “commentary from scholars and discussions with the general public,” and Earth News, “stories on environmental issues drawn from many sources.” The real fly in the ointment, as with all efforts to make knowledge accessible, is class. You have to have a computer and an Internet connection, of course. In some sense, too, this is a “professional” response meant to counter the perceived populism of the Web.

It’s still a step in the right direction. You cannot hope to be critically informed about science or anything else unless you are familiar with the process of knowledge production. And that familiarity is to some extent dependent on education. This need not be a formal education process, as Wikipedia illustrates. That’s why the forum and the news sections are as important as the Encyclopedia. Let a thousand flowers bloom.

EduSpaces

EduSpaces is a social network set up for those interested in all aspects of Education. EduSpaces is powered by the awesome Elgg, a white label social networking platform. For more information about Elgg check out the project site: http://elgg.org

from, “What is Eduspaces.”

I am not sure either, it’s a kind of blog of blogs, or a place where you can set up a blog if it is related to education. It seems to be very heavily international, and tag-clouded until the cows come home. I am not sure what I think of these thematic meta-blogs, but they are popping up all over.

I recently did a “show all posts” search at EduSpaces and came up with everything from Physics demonstrations to discussions of t-shirts, in at least three languages. I am not sure what t-shirts have to do with education, but maybe I am old fashioned. (Not that I wore a tie when I taught brick and mortar.)

I just checked again and the first entry today is about a pair of exclusive tennis shoes. Still, I did find this cool report on University Publishing In A Digital Age. I fret about insularity– already the defining characteristic of academia– but maybe this cross-pollination thing is a good idea after all.

Liberal Globalization

Globalization has brought huge overall benefits, but earnings for most U.S. workers — even those with college degrees — have been falling recently; inequality is greater now than at any other time in the last 70 years. Whatever the cause, the result has been a surge in protectionism. To save globalization, policymakers must spread its gains more widely. The best way to do that is by redistributing income.

Kenneth F. Scheve and Matthew J. Slaughter
From Foreign Affairs, July/August 2007

It seems the neo-liberal plans for the world are coming undone and, god forbid, they may be on the verge of calling for universal health care in the United States or something. Talking about “redistributing income” was once political mutiny. Clearly something has gone very wrong. What’s fascinating is the way they puzzle over the fact that so few– outside of the business community anyway– like globalization.

We are all mainly consumers, so of course we should thank the neo-liberals for all those open markets and cheap goods. Never mind that, according to Human Rights Watch, Wal-Mart and its ilk may in fact be violating international labor laws here and abroad. Or, perhaps we should show gratitude that 1 out of 3 U.S. jobs pay low wages (“$11.11 per hour or less”) according to the Center for Economic Policy and Research.

The “free markets” turn out to mostly create freedom for capital to maximize profits; this seems to be sinking in at some level. “Americans consistently say,” Scheve and Slaughter write, “that they would be more inclined to back trade and investment liberalization if it were linked to more support for those hurt in the process.” The Republicans seem to be choking the goose that laid the golden egg, and even Wall Street is thinking Democratic.