Wiki-Wishes

Having spent the past three years of my life in the Enterprise 2.0 / Collaborative software market, I remain struck by the industry’s continued lack of ability to define a compelling reason for enterprises to adopt new software applications, such as blogs, wikis, microblogs, etc. In the early days of the Enterprise 2.0 movement, much of this software was dismissed as the next wave of Knowledge Management, which was largely viewed as a zero ROI investment (or at least in the eyes of the venture capital community, it did not produce any break out, high return investments). Today, it is largely viewed as a necessary evil because the likes of Facebook and Twitter are impossible for the enterprise to ignore.

Unbundling the 20th Century Mindset, Brian Magierski

This is a piece written for a specific audience– people interested in the ways that businesses are (or are not) adapting new technologies– so it’s a little heavy on jargon. (If you are one of those people, of course, it’s not jargon at all.) But it’s worth reading because we will either find a way to use these technologies for the greater good or they will be used against us.

We could use these technologies (blogs, wikis) to re-create the workplace along more democratic lines, encouraging transparency iand eliminating the need for a lot of supervisory management. This is particularly important in education, which ought to be, among other things, leaders in workplace democratization. Universities ought to be the leaders of the leaders in this area.

If we don’t start figuring out how to use these tools they will likely be used against us. Especially if we stay unorganized, we will do more but someone else will reap the benefits. Kids who “grow up digital” may well find that, like their parents, their productivity isn’t reflected in a rising standard of living. Indeed, if recent history is any evidence, just the opposite is more likely.

Green Reading

In May, Amazon introduced the electronic book reader Kindle DX, touted as a new way to read textbooks, newspapers and other large documents. This fall, six colleges and universities will test the technology in a pilot, which includes making the textbooks for certain courses available online.

The Kindle DX (for “deluxe”) is searchable and portable, a plus for students accustomed to toting heavy backpacks. But there is another reason that some institutions jumped at the chance to try it out: the technology could substantially reduce their use of paper.

July 30, 2009, Universities Turn to Kindle — Sometimes to Save Paper, Sara Peters

Here’s another chance for me to get all crabby and complain about the way technology tends to get adapted– at least at first– mostly to help those who don’t need much help. That is, we give the best tools to the students with the sorts of privileged backgrounds that make education seem an inevitable rite of passage rather than a transformative economic and social necessity.

That’s also true of other green initiatives. Organic foods are still probably too expensive to be widely adopted; the alternative energy tax credits are not yet generous enough to really push the technology into the mainstream. (That doesn’t have to be true, of course.) We do things upside down, starting with those who need help the least, hoping that it will trickle down.

Still, I think that if the universities are willing to resist the inevitable pressure they will feel from the textbook industry, the electronic book could be a boon to affordable education. The problem, of course, will be digital rights management and property. The textbook industry will try to milk students (as always ) for as much money as possible, in effect, encouraging pirating of textbooks.

That debate is likely to create a smokescreen that obscures the real issues, which ought to center around educational affordability and access to information. The real hope is that we can use these devices to link to open courseware and to the emerging ecosystem of free textbooks. Somewhere out these someone is working on a hack for the Kindle…

Second Tier Reforms

Today, the U.S. House of Representatives took a giant step forward in comprehensive student aid reform. The Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, introduced by Education Committee Chairman George Miller, invests billions of dollars in financial aid at no new expense to taxpayers. The United States Student Association, along with college students nationwide, is ecstatic about Congressman Miller’s unsurpassed commitment to higher education.

Students Thrilled with Student Aid Reform Bill, Education is a Right, July 15, 2009

The Obama or Democratic party agenda seems fascinatingly split into two. On the one hand are the programs deemed “controversial” by some weird mixture of media interest and conservative hysteria. First it was the stimulus money and now it’s health care reform. These are certainly important efforts. But underneath or beside these efforts are an entire range of other initiatives that might add up to something just as important, if not more important. These initiatives (almost) slip under the radar.

They are noticed but then fade out of the media. Among these I would include the dropping of the F22, the so-called cash for clunker program, and now the ongoing attempts to de-privatize the student loan industry, which would make millions of dollars of new money available for Pell Grants while lowering the costs of education loans. These programs are going to start bearing fruit in the next few years and I think the effects are going to be dramatic. Taken together, they might be just as transformative as the ‘priority’ reforms.

A Sustainable Culture: John Slatin’s Ludic Pedagogy

It is a bittersweet privilege to provide the introduction to this issue of Currents, which is a tribute to John Slatin. Although we are still struggling with his loss, the remarkable work of his former students gathered here is a testament to his living legacy. It is a tribute that would have meant the most to him. He was a consummate teacher, who delighted in the successes of his students, and I know he would have been so deeply touched to know that they remember him with such gratitude. I will not repeat here what I have said in other places about John’s contributions to our field, and his innovations in computers and writing. I will say that our conversations and his example always supported and inspired me in my teaching. The outpouring of responses from his students when we offered the invitation to contribute to this issue was another reminder of the love and affection expressed by so many people throughout John’s illness and passing. The range of these pieces gives some sense of the scope and diversity of John’s scholarly and pedagogical interests and influence. In keeping with John’s love of experimentation, creativity, imagination, and exploration, the projects here are rich and diverse.

… John’s playfulness and spirit of adventure are at the heart of the MOO/webtext of Albert Rouzie and Ray Watkins: “A Sustainable Culture: John Slatin’s Ludic Pedagogy.” Their conversation ranged across diverse topics in just the way that Slatin celebrated, including Hypertext, MOOs, Interchange, authority, play, persuasion, New Media, cultural capital, progressive education, blogs, digital technology, slow reading, Open Source, cloud computing, and Twitter…

John Slatin’s Legacy, Peg Syverson

This has been out for a few weeks and I should have posted it here earlier… Anyway, now’s a good time because I’ve been traveling all week and I don’t have much time…