Nostalgia for a Repressive Past

I lived in Philadelphia for a year, and one weekend a friend, Robert, who is African-American, asked to borrow my truck so that he could move in with his girlfriend, Amy. No problem. Robert came over Saturday morning to pick up the truck, and I watched him inspect every detail– brakes, lights, wipers– carefully and thoroughly. At first I thought he was just being a little compulsive, and then I realized that what he was doing was trying to protect himself.

If I got stopped by the police, it could cost me some money; if Robert did, it might be physically dangerous. It was one of several times in my life that I was able to get it through my thick skull that being White confers certain privileges and safe passages. A traffic stop is just a traffic stop. I was thinking about Robert– about my White privileges– this week as President Obama produced his birth certificate. It’s easy to talk about racism, but the real problem is White supremacy.

Or, rather, with a kind of White nostalgia for supremacy– a fictional day when women, African-Americans, and working people knew their place. You can see it in the fetishistic coverage of the Royal Wedding in the U.S., in the attacks on unions and women’s rights, and you can see it in the headlong rush to bring the military back to their campuses. I say nostalgia because I think that, while frightening and destructive, these efforts are more symbolic than real.

The right cannot stop the technology that will eventually make abortions accessible via the local pharmacy instead of the too-easy-to-target clinic; the attacks on the unions led to a backlash against Republicans; bringing the Navy back to Columbia is not going to reverse the long intellectual tradition of anti-imperialism. President Obama may well have the last laugh, by making himself seem like the only “adult in the room.” Let the Republicans have their circus; history is on our side.

This Week in Decadence

I’ve been thinking about the meaning of decadence (after reading about Harold Bloom) a lot this week, and I know my own internal filters are probably to blame, but another piece, “Questions Abound as the College-Rankings Race Goes Global,” has gotten me thinking about a kind of institutionalized cynicism that seems to be typical of contemporary academia…. On the one hand, you have the atomized, self-serving careerism of so many “star” professors like Bloom, and on the other you have the institutional hucksterism represented as much by the profound corruptions of college athletics as by, in this case, so-called college rankings.

Hazelkorn juxtaposes the intellectual poverty of these rankings (“Rankings are essentially one-dimensional…) with their pervasive influence: “… college presidents believe rankings play a significant role in establishing and securing institutional position and reputation… colleges use rankings to help identify potential partners, assess membership of international networks and organizations, and for measuring themselves.” If we put this into historical context– increasing tuition, labor exploitation, and narcissistic professorial stars– we can begin to see why so many suspect some sort of precipitous decline in U.S. higher education.

The Hollow Men

I hate to go all ad hominem, but if I am, especially when it comes to someone like Harold Bloom (see, “Harold Bloom by the Numbers“) , I have to go for T.S. Elliot: “We are the hollow men / We are the stuffed men / Leaning together / Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!” It’s not so much Bloom’s freakish careerism, if not greed, that’s so bothersome, although that’s disturbing enough.

What gets my goat is that Bloom– and the journalist, Carlin Romano– seem so blissfully unconcerned about the ways that Bloom’s ideas reflect the self-serving decadence of academic intellectual work at this particular time in U.S. history. “This is cactus land / Here the stone images / Are raised, here they receive / The supplication of a dead man’s hand / Under the twinkle of a fading star.”

Romano calls Bloom an “unsteady Midwest autocrat… oblivious as his ritual pronouncements fall on deaf ears.” Fair enough. What’s disturbing is that way that Bloom’s status seems to excuse him from complicity in the long list of problems– from labor exploitation to administrative salaries to rising tuition– facing academia. Isn’t there a connection between these problems and the old autocrats like Bloom?

.